Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33519367›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2020

Looking for Novelty in an "Old" Receptor: Recent Advances Toward Our Understanding of GABA

David Castellano, Ryan David Shepard, Wei Lu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dimdazenil for the treatment of insomnia: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Φ value analysis underscores strong functional and structural compactness of the GABAProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Gingerols and Shogaols ofJournal of experimental pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The Effects of Variation in the GABANeuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2024
    Article
  16. Established and emerging GABAFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David CastellanoSynapse and Neural Circuit Research Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Ryan David ShepardSynapse and Neural Circuit Research Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Wei LuSynapse and Neural Circuit Research Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diverse populations of GABA

Indexed as

benzodiazepinesClptm1GABAGABAARLH4neurosteroidspharmacologyShisa7

Identifiers

PMID33519367
PMCPMC7841293
OpenAlexW3118727329

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.