Evidence mapPaperPMID 33523307Full record

ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2021

Anaesthesia as an influence in tumour progression.

Jadie Plücker, Naita M Wirsik, Alina S Ritter, Thomas Schmidt, Markus A Weigand

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jadie PlückerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. Jadie.pluecker@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5143-216X
Naita M WirsikDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Alina S RitterDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas SchmidtDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus A WeigandDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTumour growth and the formation of metastases are essential elements in the progression of cancer. The centre of treatment is the surgical resection of primary solid tumours. But even if the tumour can be removed without microscopic residual cells, local recurrences and distant metastases occur and determine the patient's fate. During the operation, tumour cells are shed from the primary tumour and released into the circulation. These circulating tumour cells might play an important role in the formation of new tumour sites. Therefore, a functional innate and adaptive immune system is essential, especially in this perioperative period. Anaesthesia influences consciousness and pain perception and interacts directly with the immune system and tumour cells.

methodsReview of the current literature concerning intra- and postoperative anaesthetic decisions and tumour progression.

resultsThere are beneficial aspects for patient survival associated with total intravenous anaesthesia, the use of regional anaesthetics and the avoidance of allogeneic red blood cell transfusions. Alternatives such as irradiated intraoperative blood salvage and preoperative iron supplementation may be advantageous in cases where transfusions are limited or not wanted. The immunosuppressive properties of opioids are theoretical, but strong evidence to avoid them does not exist. The application of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis do not impair the patient's survival and may even have a positive effect on tumour regression.

conclusionAnaesthesia does play an important part in the perioperative period in order to improve the cancer-related outcome. Further research is necessary to make more concrete recommendations.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralNeoplasmsAnesthetics, LocalHumansPerioperative PeriodPostoperative Nausea and VomitingAnesthetics, LocalCancer recurrenceGeneral anaesthesiaMetastasisNarcoticsOpioidsRegional anaesthesia

Identifiers

PMID33523307
PMCPMC8370957
OpenAlexW3127401117

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.