ArticleJournal of human genetics2021
Characterization of LILRB3 and LILRA6 allelic variants in the Japanese population.
Article in Journal of human genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation of LILR antibody specificities and development of LILRA3-specific antibodies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Article
- Identification of the hybrid geneFrontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Distinct frequency patterns of LILRB3 and LILRA6 allelic variants in Europeans.Immunogenetics · 2023Article
- Human inhibitory leukocyte Ig-like receptors: from immunotolerance to immunotherapy.JCI insight · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Leukocyte immunoglobulin (Ig)-like receptors (LILRs) are encoded by members of a human multigene family, comprising 11 protein-coding genes and two pseudogenes. Among the LILRs, LILRB3 and LILRA6 show the highest homology with each other, along with high allelic and copy number variations. Therefore, it has been difficult to discriminate between them, both genetically and functionally, precluding disease association studies of LILRB3 and LILRA6. In this study, we carefully performed variant screening of LILRB3 and LILRA6 by cDNA cloning from Japanese individuals and identified four allelic lineages showing significantly high non-synonymous-to-synonymous ratios in pairwise comparisons. Furthermore, the extracellular domains of the LILRB3*JP6 and LILRA6*JP1 alleles were identical at the DNA level, suggesting that gene conversion-like events diversified LILRB3 and LILRA6. To determine the four allelic lineages from genomic DNA, we established a lineage typing method that accurately estimated the four allelic lineages in addition to specific common alleles from genomic DNA. Analysis of LILRA6 copy number variation revealed one, two, and three copies of LILRA6 in the Japanese-in-Tokyo (JPT) population. Flow cytometric analysis showed that an anti-LILRB3 antibody did not recognize the second most common lineage in the Japanese population, indicating significant amino acid differences across the allelic lineages. Taken together, our findings indicate that our lineage typing is useful for classifying the lineage-specific functions of LILRB3 and LILRA6, serving as the basis for disease association studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.