Evidence mapPaperPMID 33527664Full record

SynthesisObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2021

Methodological issues in assessing change in dietary intake and appetite following gastric bypass surgery: A systematic review.

Tamsyn L Redpath, M Barbara E Livingstone, Aoibheann A Dunne, Adele Boyd, Carel W le Roux, Alan C Spector, Ruth K Price

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Methodological issues in assessing change in dietary intake and appetite following gastric bypass surgery: A systematic review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Tamsyn L RedpathNutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7979-5624
M Barbara E LivingstoneNutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5687-4530
Aoibheann A DunneNutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8464-5345
Adele BoydNutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8317-3844
Carel W le RouxDiabetes Complications Research Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-5521-5445
Alan C SpectorDepartment of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6817-6334
Ruth K PriceNutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8765-2842
University of Ulster · GBFlorida State University · USUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

Medical Research Council, UK MC_PC_16017NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK106112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric bypass surgery is an effective long-term treatment for individuals with severe obesity. Changes in appetite, dietary intake, and food preferences have all been postulated to contribute to postoperative body weight regulation, however, findings are inconsistent. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current literature on changes in dietary intake and appetite following gastric bypass surgery, in the context of the methodology used and the analysis, interpretation, and presentation of results. Four databases were systematically searched with terms related to "gastric bypass surgery," "appetite," and "dietary intake," and 49 papers (n = 2384 patients after gastric bypass) were eligible for inclusion. The evidence indicated that only a reduction in overall energy intake and an increase in postprandial satiety are maintained beyond 6-month post-surgery, whereas relative macronutrient intake and premeal hunger remain unchanged. However, available data were limited by inconsistencies in the methods, analysis, presentation, and interpretation of results. In particular, there was a reliance on data collected by subjective methods with minimal acknowledgment of the limitations, such as misreporting of food intake. There is a need for further work employing objective measurement of appetite and dietary intake following gastric bypass surgery to determine how these mechanisms may contribute to weight regulation in the longer term.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassObesity, MorbidAppetiteEatingEnergy IntakeHumansSatiationappetitedietary intakegastric bypassmethodology

Identifiers

PMID33527664
PMCPMC8244068
OpenAlexW3128374822

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.