ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2021
The most used questionnaires for evaluating telemedicine services.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
88 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review of methods used for COVID-19 telehealth systems evaluation: lessons from past experiences for future use.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- The State of the Art of Telemedicine Implementation Architecture: Rapid Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- A pediatric virtual care evaluation framework and its evolution using consensus methods.BMC pediatrics · 2023Guideline
- Usability Evaluation of Dashboards: A Systematic Literature Review of Tools.BioMed research international · 2023Pooled it
- Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Patient-Reported Experience Measures Within Evaluation Studies of Telemedicine Applications: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- 3D Telemedicine Outperforms 2D Telemedicine: A Randomized Crossover Trial in Reconstructive Plastic Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2026Trial
- Telemedicine-Guided Two-Incision Lower Leg Fasciotomy Performed by Combat Medics During Tactical Combat Casualty Care: A Feasibility Study.Military medicine · 2024Trial
- Attitude, Awareness and Knowledge of Telemedicine Among Romanian Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Development of the malay version of the patient satisfaction questionnaire for virtual consultation services (MPSQ-VC): content validity & face validity analysis.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Feasibility of telephone-based telemedicine for gynecologic oncology follow-up in Brazil's public health system: a descriptive pilot study.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Quality Challenges in Municipal Telecare Call Center Services: Qualitative Evaluation Using the Anchored, Realistic, Cocreated, Human, Integrated, and Evaluated (ARCHIE) Framework.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Utility and satisfaction of telemedicine for ambulatory orthopaedic care in an urban setting.Singapore medical journal · 2026Article
- Predicting Anticipated Telehealth Use: Development of the CONTEST Score and Machine Learning Models Using a National U.S. Survey.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- High patient satisfaction with both telehealth and in-person new patient visits at a large academic fertility center.F&S reports · 2026Article
- Revolutionizing Neurodegenerative Disease Management: The Synergy of AI and Pharmacy.Current aging science · 2026Review
- Article
- Six-Month Home-Based Telemedicine Program for Heart Failure and Type 2 Diabetes Patients: Applicability, Usability of Telemonitoring Devices and Apps, and Patient Satisfaction.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Usability and Concurrent Validity of the Gamified Brain Aging Monitor of Cognition (BAMCOG) for the Self-Monitoring of Perioperative Cognitive Function: A Pilot Study.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Virtual Care, What Are We Measuring and What Should We Measure? Scoping Review of Reviews.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuestionnaires are commonly used tools in telemedicine services that can help to evaluate different aspects. Selecting the ideal questionnaire for this purpose may be challenging for researchers. This study aims to review which questionnaires are used to evaluate telemedicine services in the studies, which are most common, and what aspects of telemedicine evaluation do they capture.
methodsThe PubMed database was searched in August 2020 to retrieve articles. Data extracted from the final list of articles included author/year of publication, journal of publication, type of evaluation, and evaluation questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
resultsFifty-three articles were included in this study. The questionnaire was used for evaluating the satisfaction (49%), usability (34%), acceptance (11.5%), and implementation (2%) of telemedicine services. Among telemedicine specific questionnaires, Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ) (19%), Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ) (13%), and Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire (SUTAQ) (5.5%), were respectively most frequently used in the collected articles. Other most used questionnaires generally used for evaluating the users' satisfaction, usability, and acceptance of technology were Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) (5.5%), Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction (QUIS) (5.5%), System Usability Scale (SUS) (5.5%), Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) (5.5%), and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (3.5%) respectively.
conclusionEmploying specifically designed questionnaires or designing a new questionnaire with fewer questions and more comprehensiveness in terms of the issues studied provides a better evaluation. Attention to user needs, end-user acceptance, and implementation processes, along with users' satisfaction and usability evaluation, may optimize telemedicine efforts in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.