Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33535802›Full record

SynthesisAngiology2021

High Coronary Wall Shear Stress Worsens Plaque Vulnerability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Artan Bajraktari, Ibadete Bytyçi, Michael Y Henein

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Angiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vascular mechanical forces and vascular diseases.Journal of advanced research · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Development and assessment of a histopathological stability score for atheroma plaques.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Artan BajraktariInstitute of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umea University, Sweden.
Ibadete BytyçiInstitute of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umea University, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8996-4257
Michael Y HeneinInstitute of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umea University, Sweden.
St George's, University of London · GBUmeå University · SEUniversity Clinical Center of Kosovo · XK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the impact of wall shear stress (WSS) severity on arterial plaque vulnerability.

methodsWe systematically searched electronic databases and selected studies which assessed the relationship between WSS measured by intravascular ultrasound and coronary artery plaque features. In 7 studies, a total of 615 patients with 28 276 arterial segments (median follow-up: 7.71 months) were identified. At follow-up, the pooled analysis showed high WSS to be associated with regression of plaque fibrous area, weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.11 (95% CI: -0.20 to -0.02,

conclusionsHigh WSS in coronary arteries is associated with worsening plaque vulnerability and more profound arterial wall remodeling compared with low WSS.

Indexed as

Coronary CirculationHemodynamicsPlaque, AtheroscleroticVascular RemodelingAdultAgedCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsRupture, Spontaneouscoronary artery diseaseintravascular ultrasoundwall shear stress

Identifiers

PMID33535802
PMCPMC8326896
OpenAlexW3128382675

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.