Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33537289›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020

Nanomaterial Nitric Oxide Delivery in Traumatic Orthopedic Regenerative Medicine.

Albert Thomas Anastasio, Ariana Paniagua, Carrie Diamond, Harrison R Ferlauto, Joseph S Fernandez-Moure

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Application of Antioxidant Compounds in Bone Defect Repair.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Nitric Oxide: Physiological Functions, Delivery, and Biomedical Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The Role of Nitric Oxide in Stem Cell Biology.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Albert Thomas AnastasioDuke University Health System, Durham, NC, United States.
Ariana PaniaguaDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Carrie DiamondDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Harrison R FerlautoDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Joseph S Fernandez-MoureDuke University Health System, Durham, NC, United States.
Duke University · USDuke University Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Achieving bone fracture union after trauma represents a major challenge for the orthopedic surgeon. Fracture non-healing has a multifactorial etiology and there are many risk factors for non-fusion. Environmental factors such as wound contamination, infection, and open fractures can contribute to non-healing, as can patient specific factors such as poor vascular status and improper immunologic response to fracture. Nitric oxide (NO) is a small, neutral, hydrophobic, highly reactive free radical that can diffuse across local cell membranes and exert paracrine functions in the vascular wall. This molecule plays a role in many biologic pathways, and participates in wound healing through decontamination, mediating inflammation, angiogenesis, and tissue remodeling. Additionally, NO is thought to play a role in fighting wound infection by mitigating growth of both Gram negative and Gram positive pathogens. Herein, we discuss recent developments in NO delivery mechanisms and potential implications for patients with bone fractures. NO donors are functional groups that store and release NO, independent of the enzymatic actions of NOS. Donor molecules include organic nitrates/nitrites, metal-NO complexes, and low molecular weight NO donors such as NONOates. Numerous advancements have also been made in developing mechanisms for localized nanomaterial delivery of nitric oxide to bone. NO-releasing aerogels, sol- gel derived nanomaterials, dendrimers, NO-releasing micelles, and core cross linked star (CCS) polymers are all discussed as potential avenues of NO delivery to bone. As a further target for improved fracture healing, 3d bone scaffolds have been developed to include potential for nanoparticulated NO release. These advancements are discussed in detail, and their potential therapeutic advantages are explored. This review aims to provide valuable insight for translational researchers who wish to improve the armamentarium of the feature trauma surgeon through use of NO mediated augmentation of bone healing.

Indexed as

biologicbiologic therapybonebone healingfracture repairnitric oxideosteoinduction

Identifiers

PMID33537289
PMCPMC7849904
OpenAlexW3126142888

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.