Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33545934›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2021

Efficacy and safety of Bacillus coagulans LBSC in irritable bowel syndrome: A prospective, interventional, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study [CONSORT Compliant].

Anil Kumar Gupta, Chiranjit Maity

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06408610 (Moderate Continuous Versus High Interval Intensity Training on Gut Dysbiosis and Glucagon Like Peptide Hormone in Irritable Bowel Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06408610 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Moderate Continuous Versus High Interval Intensity Training on Gut Dysbiosis and Glucagon Like Peptide Hormone in Irritable Bowel Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled66ConditionsIrritable Bowel Syndrome, Obesity, DysbiosisArmsmoderate intensity continuous training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Nutrients · 2026
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. The probioticGut microbes
    Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Raising Expectations in IBS-C Management.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Clinical and In Vitro Safety ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Influences ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Anil Kumar GuptaProbiotics Laboratory, Advanced Enzyme Technologies Ltd., Sun Magnetica, Louiswadi, Thane (W), Maharashtra, India.
AML Superconductivity and Magnetics (United States) · USApple (Israel) · IL

Funding

Advanced Enzyme Technologies Ltd. no
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

goalsTo evaluate safety and efficacy of Bacillus coagulans LBSC [DSM17654] in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) through a prospective, interventional, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled, CONSORT compliant clinical trial.

backgroundBacteriotherapy shows promising impact on alleviating clinical conditions of IBS and associated functional gastrointestinal disorders. B coagulans LBSC is a genetically and phenotypically safe probiotic strain used in this study to study its impact on ameliorating IBS symptoms and improving quality of life.

methodsIn this interventional, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study, total 40 subjects (18-65 years) were screened through Rome IV criteria and randomized into 2 groups, that is, interventional and placebo arm (n = 20/arm). Similar dosages were received by both the arm, that is, placebo (vehicle) and interventional arm (B coagulans LBSC, 6 billion/d) for a period of 80 days. Study completed with per protocol subjects (n = 38) and results were considered to evaluate the primary and secondary endpoints.

resultsAssessment through Digestive Symptom Frequency Questionnaire 5 point Likert scale showed significant improvement in interventional arm compared to placebo on symptoms such as bloating/cramping, abdominal pain, diarrhea, constipation, stomach rumbling, nausea, vomiting, headache, and anxiety. Maximum of "no symptoms" cases and mild to moderate gastrointestinal symptoms along with improved stool consistency were from interventional arm tested following IBS severity scoring system and Bristol stool form scale. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed no clinical difference of gastrointestinal mucosa between both the arms. B coagulans LBSC was well tolerated with no serious adverse events.

conclusionsB coagulans LBSC was safe for human consumption and efficacious in alleviating overall pathophysiological symptoms of IBS and thereby improving inclusive quality of life evaluated.

Indexed as

Bacillus coagulansProbioticsAdolescentAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIrritable Bowel SyndromeMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33545934
PMCPMC7837859
OpenAlexW3123425432

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.