Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33546492›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

A Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes in Norway.

Samira Behboudi-Gandevani, Ranjan Parajuli, Mojtaba Vaismoradi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Exploring Structural Uncertainty in Cost-Effectiveness Modeling of Gestational Diabetes Screening: An Application Example from Norway.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024
    Article
  8. Infant of a diabetic mother: clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment.Pediatric endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism · 2024
    Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samira Behboudi-GandevaniFaculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, 8049 Bodø, Norway.
Ranjan ParajuliFaculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, 8049 Bodø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8241-3850
Mojtaba VaismoradiFaculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, 8049 Bodø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5157-4886

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a major public health problem and a threat to maternal and child health. There is a lack of integrated and systematically synthesized knowledge about the prevalence GDM in Norway. Therefore, this systemic review aimed to present the best available peer-reviewed published evidence from the past 20 years about the prevalence of GDM in Norway. A comprehensive literature search was performed on online databases consisting of PubMed (including Medline), Web of Science, and Scopus to retrieve original research articles published on the prevalence of GDM up to August 2020. Also, databases of Norart and SveMed

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalChildFemaleHumansNorwayPregnancyPrevalenceProspective StudiesRisk FactorsGDMgestational diabetes mellitushealth careNorwayprevalencepublic healthreproductive healthsystemic review

Identifiers

PMID33546492
PMCPMC7913746

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.