Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33551880›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2020

Brain Age Prediction With Morphological Features Using Deep Neural Networks: Results From Predictive Analytic Competition 2019.

Angela Lombardi, Alfonso Monaco, Giacinto Donvito, Nicola Amoroso, Roberto Bellotti, Sabina Tangaro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A deep neural network estimation of brain age is sensitive to cognitive impairment and decline.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Angela LombardiIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Bari, Italy.
Alfonso MonacoIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Bari, Italy.
Giacinto DonvitoIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Bari, Italy.
Nicola AmorosoIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Bari, Italy.
Roberto BellottiIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Bari, Italy.
Sabina TangaroIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Bari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Morphological changes in the brain over the lifespan have been successfully described by using structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in conjunction with machine learning (ML) algorithms. International challenges and scientific initiatives to share open access imaging datasets also contributed significantly to the advance in brain structure characterization and brain age prediction methods. In this work, we present the results of the predictive model based on deep neural networks (DNN) proposed during the Predictive Analytic Competition 2019 for brain age prediction of 2638 healthy individuals. We used FreeSurfer software to extract some morphological descriptors from the raw MRI scans of the subjects collected from 17 sites. We compared the proposed DNN architecture with other ML algorithms commonly used in the literature (RF, SVR, Lasso). Our results highlight that the DNN models achieved the best performance with

Indexed as

aging biomarkerbrain agingdeep neural networksFreeSurfermachine learningmorphological featuresMRI

Identifiers

PMID33551880
PMCPMC7854554

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.