SynthesisPancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]2021
Biomarkers of Chronic Pancreatitis: A systematic literature review.
Synthesis in Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.], 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of stroke blood biomarker data highlights need for more translational research methods.Nature communications · 2026Pooled it
- Understanding the Pathophysiology of Chronic Pancreatitis: A Comprehensive Review Unraveling Pain Mechanisms and the Role of Psychosocial Factors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Personalizing treatment of pancreatitis-associated chronic pain: the need for an integrated omics approach.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026Review
- Advancing the Diagnosis and Treatment of Early Chronic Pancreatitis Through Innovation in Imaging and Biomarker Profiling-A Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Utility of dual-energy CT and advanced multiparametric MRI based imaging biomarkers of pancreatic fibrosis in grading the severity of chronic pancreatitis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Article
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers of Chronic Pancreatitis: A Conceptual Framework Based on the PRoBE Design.Gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Circulating immune signatures in chronic pancreatitis with and without preceding acute pancreatitis: A pilot study.Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] · 2024Article
- Article
- Purinergic and Adenosinergic Signaling in Pancreatobiliary Diseases.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Review
- Consortium for the study of chronic pancreatitis, diabetes, and pancreatic cancer: achievements and future directions.Current opinion in gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Pancreatic Fibrosis (Early Chronic Pancreatitis) as Emerging Diagnosis in Structural Causes of Dyspepsia: Evidence from Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Shear Wave Elastography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic pancreatitis (CP) does not have diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers. CP is the end stage of a progressive inflammatory syndrome that is diagnosed at late stages by morphologic features. To diagnose earlier stages of the disease, a new mechanistic definition was established based on identifying underlying pathogenic processes and biomarker evidence of disease activity and stage. Although multiple risk factors are known, the corresponding biomarkers needed to make a highly accurate diagnosis of earlier disease stages have not been established. The goal of this study is to systematically analyze the literature to identify the most likely candidates for development into biomarkers of CP.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review of candidate analytes from easily accessible biological fluids and identified 67 studies that compared CP to nonpancreatic-disease controls. We then ranked candidate biomarkers for sensitivity and specificity by area under the receiver operator curves (AUROCs).
resultsFive biomarkers had a large effect size (an AUROC > 0.96), whereas 30 biomarkers had a moderate effect size (an AUROC between 0.96 and 0.83) for distinguishing CP cases from controls or other diseases. However, the studies reviewed had marked variability in design, enrollment criteria, and biospecimen sample handling and collection.
conclusionsSeveral biomarkers have the potential for evaluation in prospective cohort studies and should be correlated with risk factors, clinical features, imaging studies and outcomes. The Consortium for the Study of Chronic Pancreatitis, Diabetes and Pancreas Cancer provides recommendations for avoiding design biases and heterogeneity in sample collection and handling in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.