Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33558365›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2021

A Regenerative Perspective on Successful and Failed T-Cell Immunity.

Steven L Reiner

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steven L ReinerDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology and Department of Pediatrics, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA sr2978@cumc.columbia.edu.
Columbia University · US

Funding

Asymmetric Lymphocyte Division in the Immune ResponseR01AI076458 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI REINER, STEVEN L · 2008 to 2019
$3.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI076458
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heightened immunity after a primary infection, persistent control of low-level infection, or vanquished immunity from chronic-active infection and cancer are interrelated issues concerning the nature of T-cell regeneration during immunity. For many regenerating tissues and cellular systems, such as epithelia and blood, there are at least three distinguishable stages of development and repair, marked by progressive loss of self-renewal and progressive commitment to differentiation. T cells seem to be no different. Quiescent precursors become activated and yield anabolic, proliferative progenitors while self-renewing the quiescent precursor population. Activated progenitors then yield differentiated cellular descendants alongside the self-renewal of progenitors. Nomenclature reflecting the mutually opposing nature of T-cell self-renewal and T-cell differentiation would help synchronize phenomena such as T-cell memory, protective immunity, and T-cell exhaustion with other regenerative paradigms, as well as offer new strategies to influence the intensity and duration of immunity.

Indexed as

Cell Self RenewalAdaptive ImmunityCell DifferentiationHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1-alphaHumansModels, ImmunologicalRegenerationT-LymphocytesHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1-alphaHNF1A protein, human

Identifiers

PMID33558365
PMCPMC8247563
OpenAlexW3127338638

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.