Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33570795›Full record

ArticleTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2021

Recipient age and outcome after pancreas transplantation: a retrospective dual-center analysis.

Franka Messner, Marjolein Leemkuil, Yifan Yu, Allan B Massie, Felix J Krendl, Stan Benjamens, Claudia Bösmüller, Annemarie Weissenbacher, Stefan Schneeberger, Robert A Pol and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Franka MessnerDepartment of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2100-6914
Marjolein LeemkuilDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1745-7889
Yifan YuDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Allan B MassieDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Felix J KrendlDepartment of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Stan BenjamensDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3266-9246
Claudia BösmüllerDepartment of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Annemarie WeissenbacherDepartment of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Stefan SchneebergerDepartment of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2619-8639
Robert A PolDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Christian MargreiterDepartment of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With a later onset of diabetes complications and thus increasing age of transplant candidates, many centers have extended upper age limits for pancreas transplantation. This study investigates the effect of recipient and donor age on outcomes after pancreas transplantation.We retrospectively analyzed 565 pancreas transplants performed at two Eurotransplant centers. The cohort was split at a recipient and donor age of 50 and 40 years, respectively. Median recipient age in old patients (≥50 years; 27.2%) was 54 years and 40 years in young patients (<50 years). Compared to young recipients, old recipients had an inferior patient survival rate (≥50: 5yr, 82.8%; 10yr, 65.6%; <50: 5yr, 93.3%; 10yr, 82.0%; P < 0.0001). Old recipients demonstrated comparable death-censored pancreas (≥50: 1yr, 80.6%; 5yr, 70.2%; <50: 1yr, 87.3%; 5yr, 77.8%; P = 0.35) and kidney graft survival (≥50: 1yr, 97.4%; 5yr, 90.6%; <50: 1yr, 97.8%; 5yr, 90.2%; P = 0.53) compared to young recipients. Besides a lower rate of kidney rejection, similar relative risks for postoperative complications were detected in old and young patients. This study shows that despite an increased mortality in old recipients, excellent graft survival can be achieved similar to that of young patients. Age alone should not exclude patients from receiving a pancreas transplant.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationPancreas TransplantationGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTissue DonorsTreatment Outcomedonor agepostoperative complicationsrecipient agesimultaneous pancreas kidney transplantationsurvival

Identifiers

PMID33570795
PMCPMC8049064

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.