ArticleDer Pathologe2021
[Clonality analysis in practice].
Article in Der Pathologe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malignant lymphomas are derived from a common progenitor cell with a unique rearrangement of immunoglobulin or T‑cell receptor genes. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based analyses allow detection of the clone and are an important adjunct for the diagnosis of difficult lymphoproliferations, e.g. for the discrimination of reactive versus malignant lesions. Further applications are detection of disease dissemination and evaluation of the clonal relationship of two lymphomas. However, clonality analysis is not a stand-alone test and must always be considered in context with clinical, histological and immunophenotypic data. For the correct use of clonality analysis, comprehensive knowledge of the biological basis, technical requirements and interpretation are needed in order to avoid incorrect conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.