Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33576176›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics2021

Increasing the resolution and precision of psychiatric genome-wide association studies by re-imputing summary statistics using a large, diverse reference panel.

Chris Chatzinakos, Donghyung Lee, Na Cai, Vladimir I Vladimirov, Bradley T Webb, Brien P Riley, Jonathan Flint, Kenneth S Kendler, Kerry J Ressler, Nikolaos P Daskalakis and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Increasing the resolution and precision of psychiatric genome-wide association studies by re-imputing summary statistics using a large, diverse reference panel.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Chris ChatzinakosDepartment of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8997-6488
Donghyung LeeDepartment of Statistics, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, USA.
Na CaiTranslational Genetics Group, Helmholtz Institute, Munich, Germany.
Vladimir I VladimirovDepartment of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Bradley T WebbDepartment of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0576-5366
Brien P RileyDepartment of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Jonathan FlintCenter for Neurobehavioral Genetics, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Kenneth S KendlerDepartment of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8689-6570
Kerry J ResslerDepartment of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA.
Nikolaos P DaskalakisDepartment of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1660-9112
Silviu-Alin BacanuDepartment of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Virginia Commonwealth University · USBroad Institute · USHarvard University · USHelmholtz Zentrum München · DEMiami University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR002541 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2018 to 2022
$93.0M
Project 5 - Genetic architecture of alcohol use disorder using cross-trait genetic correlations and public next-generation sequencing studiesP50AA022537 · NIAAA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI JENNIFER T WOLSTENHOLME · 2014 to 2026
$19.6M
SPARED CenterP50MH115874 · NIMH · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI ROSSO, ISABELLE M · 2019 to 2023
$13.7M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002542 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI BREDELLA, MIRIAM ANTOINETTE, RUTKOVE, SEWARD B. · 2018 to 2022
$8.7M
Psychiatric Genomics Consortium for PTSDR01MH106595 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI KARESTAN C KOENEN, Caroline M Nievergelt · 2016 to 2026
$8.4M
Site 3/3, Understanding PTSD through Postmortem Targeted Brain MultiomicsR01MH117292 · NIMH · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI Nikolaos Daskalakis, KERRY J. RESSLER · 2018 to 2026
$5.0M
A Genome Wide Association Study of Severe Alcohol Use DisorderR01AA026750 · NIAAA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI KENDLER, KENNETH SEEDMAN, SVIKIS, DACE S · 2018 to 2022
$3.4M
4/7 Psychiatric Genomics Consortium: Advancing Discovery and ImpactR01MH124847 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI NIEVERGELT, CAROLINE M, SEBAT, JONATHAN · 2021 to 2025
$2.1M
Integrating neuroimaging and brain gene expression for functional characterization of psychiatric GWASR21MH121909 · NIMH · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI DASKALAKIS, NIKOLAOS · 2020 to 2020
$451k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002542NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002541NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA022537NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA026750NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH115874NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106595NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117292NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH124847NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH121909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genotype imputation across populations of mixed ancestry is critical for optimal discovery in large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Methods for direct imputation of GWAS summary-statistics were previously shown to be practically as accurate as summary statistics produced after raw genotype imputation, while incurring orders of magnitude lower computational burden. Given that direct imputation needs a precise estimation of linkage-disequilibrium (LD) and that most of the methods using a small reference panel for example, ~2,500-subject coming from the 1000 Genome-Project, there is a great need for much larger and more diverse reference panels. To accurately estimate the LD needed for an exhaustive analysis of any cosmopolitan cohort, we developed DISTMIX2. DISTMIX2: (a) uses a much larger and more diverse reference panel compared to traditional reference panels, and (b) can estimate weights of ethnic-mixture based solely on Z-scores, when allele frequencies are not available. We applied DISTMIX2 to GWAS summary-statistics from the psychiatric genetic consortium (PGC). DISTMIX2 uncovered signals in numerous new regions, with most of these findings coming from the rarer variants. Rarer variants provide much sharper location for the signals compared with common variants, as the LD for rare variants extends over a lower distance than for common ones. For example, while the original PGC post-traumatic stress disorder GWAS found only 3 marginal signals for common variants, we now uncover a very strong signal for a rare variant in PKN2, a gene associated with neuronal and hippocampal development. Thus, DISTMIX2 provides a robust and fast (re)imputation approach for most psychiatric GWAS-studies.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideCohort StudiesGene FrequencyGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansLinkage DisequilibriumMental DisordersPhenotypeReference StandardsSoftwaredirect imputationgeneticsGWASsummary statistcis

Identifiers

PMID33576176
PMCPMC8247874
OpenAlexW3128665475

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.