Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33577292›Full record

ReviewAccounts of chemical research2021

Natural Product Synthesis through the Lens of Informatics.

Stone Woo, Ryan A Shenvi

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Accounts of chemical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Bidirectional Modification of aACS central science · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Retrosynthetic Simplicity.Synlett : accounts and rapid communications in synthetic organic chemistry · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Synthesis of (-)-Cotylenol, a 14-3-3 Molecular Glue Component.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Chemical Evolution of Natural Product Structure.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2022
    Article
  20. Translational Informatics for Natural Products as Antidepressant Agents.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stone WooDepartment of Chemistry, Scripps Research, 10550 North Torrey Lines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, United States.
Ryan A ShenviDepartment of Chemistry, Scripps Research, 10550 North Torrey Lines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8353-6449
Scripps Institution of Oceanography · US

Funding

Unusual Pharmacophores and New Tools for Cross-CouplingR35GM122606 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI Ryan Ashok Shenvi · 2017 to 2026
$7.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122606
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retrosynthetic analysis emerged in the 1960s as a teaching tool with profound implications. Its educational value can be appreciated by a glance at total synthesis manuscripts over 50 years later, most of which contain a retrosynthesis on page one. Its vision extended to computer language-a pioneering idea in the 20th century that continues to expand the frontiers today. The same principles that guide a student to evaluate, expand, and refine a series of bond dissections can be programmed, so that computer assistance can perform the same tasks but at faster speeds.The slow step in the synthesis of complex structures, however, is seldom route design. Compression of molecular information into close proximity (

Indexed as

CheminformaticsBiological ProductsMolecular StructureBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID33577292
PMCPMC9993422
OpenAlexW3129164146

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.