Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33585166›Full record

ReviewCurrent clinical microbiology reports2021

Derek J Pinto, Sumiti Vinayak

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current clinical microbiology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Synergistic Effect of Tanabesol and Calcium Hydroxide onInternational journal of veterinary science and medicine · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. TKL family kinases in human apicomplexan pathogens.Molecular and biochemical parasitology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Detection and Molecular Characterization ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Derek J PintoDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2001 South Lincoln Avenue, Urbana, IL 61802 USA.
Sumiti VinayakDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2001 South Lincoln Avenue, Urbana, IL 61802 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4549-6268
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Molecular signaling mechanisms controlling Cryptosporidium proliferation and developmentR01AI150961 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI ALAM, SUMITI VINAYAK · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
Tool for studying essential gene function in Cryptosporidium parvumR21AI142380 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI ALAM, SUMITI VINAYAK · 2019 to 2020
$427k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI150961NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI142380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewRECENT

findingsRecent development of genetics and new animal models of infection, along with progress in cell culture platforms to complete the parasite lifecycle in vitro, is greatly advancing the SUMMARY: In this review, we will discuss our current knowledge of host-parasite interactions and how genetic manipulation of

Indexed as

CryptosporidiumGeneticsHost-parasite interactionsInfection modelsParasite biologyPathogenesis

Identifiers

PMID33585166
PMCPMC7868307
OpenAlexW3128258447

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.