Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33586564›Full record

ReviewClimacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society2021

Interactions between estradiol, diabetes, and brain aging and the risk for cognitive impairment.

C E Hugenschmidt, T Duran, M A Espeland

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C E HugenschmidtDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9126-7565
T DuranDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3502-8295
M A EspelandDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3711-1949
Wake Forest University · US

Funding

Wake Forest Alzheimer's Disease Core CenterP30AG049638 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WILLIAMSON, JEFF DOUGLAS · 2016 to 2020
$12.2M
The interaction between diabetes and estradiol on human brain metabolism in postmenopausal womenR21AG054955 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HUGENSCHMIDT, CHRISTINA E · 2017 to 2018
$426k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG049638NIA NIH HHS R21 AG054955
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Women's Health Initiative Memory Study reported that older women using conjugated equine estrogens hormone therapy (HT) with or without medroxyprogesterone acetate were at increased risk for probable dementia and smaller brain volumes. These adverse effects were greatest among women who had type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) at baseline or who developed the disease during follow-up. This review summarizes existing literature from randomized trials, observational studies, and preclinical studies to provide a fundamental understanding of the effects of the interaction between T2DM and HT on cognitive and metabolic health changes in brain aging.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2EstradiolAgedAgingBrainHumansEstradiolbioenergeticscognitiondementiadiabetesestradiolHormone therapymenopausemetabolism

Identifiers

PMID33586564
PMCPMC8411924
OpenAlexW3129333665

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.