Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33596092›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of sports medicine2021

Immobilization in External Rotation and Abduction Versus Arthroscopic Stabilization After First-Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Marvin Minkus, Matthias Königshausen, Stephan Pauly, Dirk Maier, Frieder Mauch, Thomas Stein, Stefan Greiner, Mohamed Moursy, Markus Scheibel

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of sports medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05532150 (Conservative Versus Operative Management of First Time Shoulder Dislocations), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05532150 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Conservative Versus Operative Management of First Time Shoulder Dislocations

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2026 to 2032Enrolled200ConditionsShoulder DislocationArmsArthroscopic Bankart repair, Physical therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Systematic Review of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Outcomes for Anterior Shoulder Instability.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. [Treatment strategies for traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  16. [Mid-term effectiveness of arthroscopic Bankart repair in treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Marvin MinkusDepartment for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Matthias KönigshausenDepartment of Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedics, Ruhr-University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Stephan PaulyDepartment for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Dirk MaierDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Frieder MauchDepartment of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Sportklinik Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Thomas SteinDepartment of Sport Traumatology, Knee and Shoulder Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Stefan GreinerSporthopaedicum Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Mohamed MoursyOrthopedics & Trauma Centre, Medical Faculty of Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Markus ScheibelDepartment for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEBerufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main · DEBG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum · DEKlinikum Stuttgart · DEOTH Regensburg · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment of first-time shoulder dislocation (FSD) is a topic of debate. After high rates of recurrent instability after nonoperative management were reported in the literature, primary repair of FSD significantly increased. At the same time, new concepts were proposed that had promising results for immobilization in external rotation (ER) and abduction (ABD). PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the recurrence rates (primary outcome) and clinical outcomes (secondary outcome parameters) of immobilization in ER+ABD versus arthroscopic primary stabilization after FSD. STUDY

designRandomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

methodsIn a multicenter randomized controlled trial, patients with FSD were randomized to either treatment with immobilization in 60° of ER plus 30° of ABD (group 1) or surgical treatment with arthroscopic Bankart repair (group 2). Clinical evaluation was performed 1, 3, and 6 weeks as well as 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively or after reduction, including range of motion, instability testing, subjective shoulder value, Constant-Murley score, Rowe score, and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index. Recurrent instability events were prospectively recorded.

resultsBetween 2011 and 2017, a total of 112 patients were included in this study. Of these, 60 patients were allocated to group 1 and 52 to group 2. At the 24-month follow-up, 91 patients (81.3%) were available for clinical examination. The recurrence rate was 19.1% in group 1 and 2.3% in group 2 (

conclusionImmobilization in ER+ABD versus primary arthroscopic shoulder stabilization for the treatment of FSD showed no differences in clinical shoulder scores. However, recurrent instability was significantly higher after nonoperative treatment.

Indexed as

Joint InstabilityShoulder DislocationShoulder JointArthroscopyHumansOntarioRange of Motion, ArticularRecurrenceRotationShoulderTreatment Outcomefirst-time shoulder dislocationimmobilization in external rotation and abductionshoulder instabilityshoulder stabilization

Identifiers

PMID33596092
PMCPMC7961655
OpenAlexW3131014616

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.