Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33598015›Full record

ArticlePostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology2020

Temporal changes in the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease in patients following myocardial revascularization.

Paweł Kozieł, Piotr Jankowski, Sławomir Surowiec, Piotr Bogacki, Piotr Gomuła, Ewa Mirek-Bryniarska, Jadwiga Nessler, Piotr Podolec, Marek Rajzer, Danuta Czarnecka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The association of body composition assessment with hospital length of stay in off-pump coronary artery bypass patients.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2023
    Article
  2. Sources of patients' knowledge about cardiovascular disease prevention in Poland - a pilot study.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paweł KoziełFirst Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology and Hypertension, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Piotr JankowskiFirst Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology and Hypertension, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Sławomir SurowiecFirst Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology and Hypertension, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Piotr BogackiDepartment of Cardiology, Ludwik Rydygier District Hospital, Krakow, Poland.
Piotr GomułaDepartment of Cardiology, Gabriel Narutowicz Memorial General Hospital, Krakow, Poland.
Ewa Mirek-BryniarskaDepartment of Cardiology, Jozef Dietl Hospital, Krakow, Poland.
Jadwiga NesslerDepartment of Coronary Heart Disease, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University, Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Piotr PodolecDepartment of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Marek RajzerFirst Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology and Hypertension, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Danuta CzarneckaFirst Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology and Hypertension, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Jagiellonian University · PLInstitute of Cardiology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWell-organized, effective secondary prevention of coronary artery disease (CAD) has a potential to improve the patients' prognosis following myocardial revascularization procedures.

aimTo evaluate overtime changes in the implementation of the ESC guidelines for secondary prevention by assessing control of the main risk factors and the rate of cardioprotective drug use in patients following myocardial revascularization procedures. MATERIAL AND

methodsPatients aged < 81 years who had been hospitalized for a myocardial revascularization procedure in five hospitals serving Krakow and surrounding districts were recruited and interviewed 6-18 months following discharge. Their personal medical history, medication use and control of the main cardiovascular risk factors were evaluated using a standard questionnaire in 2006-2007, 2011-2013, and 2016-2017. The same five hospitals took part in surveys on each occasion.

resultsWe examined 260 patients in 2006-2007, 200 in 2011-2013 and 190 in 2016-2017. We noted a significant difference in the management of surveys participants: 62% underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and 38% coronary artery coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in 2006-2007 whereas the corresponding proportions in 2016-2017 were 90% and 10%. The proportion of patients who did not achieve target blood pressure (according to ESC guidelines valid at the time of each survey) in 2006-2007, 2011-2013 and 2016-2017 was 53.5%, 52.3%, and 38.9%, respectively, the proportion of those who did not achieve the LDL cholesterol target (according to ESC guidelines valid at the time of each survey) was 36.3%, 64.0%, and 61.7%, respectively, and the proportion of those with high fasting glucose was 12.6%, 14.6%, and 19.7%, respectively. The proportion of smokers was 16.2%, 19.5%, and 16.8%, whereas 30.5%, 28.6% and 40.5% of patients were obese in 2006-2007, 2011-2013 and 2016-2017, respectively. The proportion of patients taking antiplatelets (91.8% vs. 92.0% vs. 96.3%), β-blockers (90.3% vs. 87.5% vs. 92.6%), and lipid-lowering drugs (88.7% vs. 91.0% vs. 93.7%) did not change significantly.Conclusions: The analysis of three multicenter surveys provides evidence of the considerable potential for a further reduction in cardiovascular risk in patients following elective myocardial revascularization in Poland.

Indexed as

coronary artery bypass graftingcoronary artery diseasepercutaneous coronary interventionrisk factorssecondary prevention

Identifiers

PMID33598015
PMCPMC7863836
OpenAlexW3126885347

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.