Evidence mapPaperPMID 33600406Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Metformin doses to ensure efficacy and safety in patients with reduced kidney function.

Isabelle H S Kuan, Luke C Wilson, Jed C Leishman, Samuel Cosgrove, Robert J Walker, Tracey L Putt, John B W Schollum, Daniel F B Wright

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The influence of flip-flop in population pharmacokinetic analyses.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Dose banding - Weighing up benefits, risks and therapeutic failure.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Isabelle H S KuanSchool of Pharmacy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3186-8040
Luke C WilsonDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Jed C LeishmanDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Samuel CosgroveDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Robert J WalkerDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3366-0956
Tracey L PuttDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
John B W SchollumDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Daniel F B WrightSchool of Pharmacy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
University of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to develop a metformin dosing strategy to optimise efficacy and safety in patients with reduced kidney function. Metformin data from two studies stratified by kidney function were analysed. The relationship between metformin clearance and kidney function estimates was explored using a regression analysis. The maintenance dose range was predicted at different bands of kidney function to achieve an efficacy target of 1 mg/L for steady-state plasma concentrations. The dosing strategy was evaluated using simulations from a published metformin pharmacokinetic model to determine the probability of concentrations exceeding those associated with lactic acidosis risk, i.e. a steady-state average concentration of 3 mg/L and a maximum (peak) concentration of 5 mg/L. A strong relationship between metformin clearance and estimated kidney function using the Cockcroft and Gault (r2 = 0.699), MDRD (r2 = 0.717) and CKD-Epi (r2 = 0.735) equations was found. The probability of exceeding the safety targets for plasma metformin concentration was <5% for most doses and kidney function levels. The lower dose of 500 mg daily was required to maintain concentrations below the safety limits for patients with an eGFR of 15-29 mL/min. Our analysis suggests that a maximum daily dose of 2250, 1700, 1250, 1000, and 500 in patients with normal kidney function, CKD stage 2, 3a, 3b and 4, respectively, will provide a reasonable probability of achieving efficacy and safety. Our results support the cautious of use metformin at appropriate doses in patients with impaired kidney function.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Drug Dosage CalculationsFemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsKidney DiseasesKidney Function TestsMaleMetforminMiddle AgedYoung AdultHypoglycemic AgentsMetformin

Identifiers

PMID33600406
PMCPMC7891741
OpenAlexW3131229629

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.