Evidence mapPaperPMID 33608002Full record

ArticleCardiovascular diabetology2021

Diabetic phenotype and prognosis of patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction in a real life cohort.

Sibille Lejeune, Clotilde Roy, Alisson Slimani, Agnès Pasquet, David Vancraeynest, Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde, Bernhard L Gerber, Christophe Beauloye, Anne-Catherine Pouleur

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sibille LejeuneDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc and Pôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire (CARD), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cardiovascular Division, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate, 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1918-7683
Clotilde RoyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc and Pôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire (CARD), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cardiovascular Division, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate, 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Alisson SlimaniDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc and Pôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire (CARD), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cardiovascular Division, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate, 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Agnès PasquetDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc and Pôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire (CARD), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cardiovascular Division, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate, 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
David VancraeynestDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc and Pôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire (CARD), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cardiovascular Division, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate, 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Jean-Louis VanoverscheldeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc and Pôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire (CARD), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cardiovascular Division, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate, 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Bernhard L GerberDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc and Pôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire (CARD), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cardiovascular Division, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate, 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Christophe Beauloye *Division of Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc and Pôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire (CARD), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cardiovascular Division, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate, 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Anne-Catherine Pouleur *Division of Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc and Pôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire (CARD), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cardiovascular Division, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate, 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium. anne-catherine.pouleur@uclouvain.be.
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous syndrome, with several underlying etiologic and pathophysiologic factors. The presence of diabetes might identify an important phenotype, with implications for therapeutic strategies. While diabetes is associated with worse prognosis in HFpEF, the prognostic impact of glycemic control is yet unknown. Hence, we investigated phenotypic differences between diabetic and non-diabetic HFpEF patients (pts), and the prognostic impact of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C).

methodsWe prospectively enrolled 183 pts with HFpEF (78 ± 9 years, 38% men), including 70 (38%) diabetics (type 2 diabetes only). They underwent 2D echocardiography (n = 183), cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) (n = 150), and were followed for a combined outcome of all-cause mortality and first HF hospitalization. The prognostic impact of diabetes and glycemic control were determined with Cox proportional hazard models, and illustrated by adjusted Kaplan Meier curves.

resultsDiabetic HFpEF pts were younger (76 ± 9 vs 80 ± 8 years, p = 0.002), more obese (BMI 31 ± 6 vs 27 ± 6 kg/m

conclusionOur study highlights phenotypic features characterizing diabetic patients with HFpEF. Notably, they are younger and more obese than their non-diabetic counterpart, but suffer less from atrial fibrillation. Although diabetes is a predictor of poor outcome in HFpEF, intensive glycemic control (HbA1C < 7%) in diabetic patients is associated with worse prognosis.

Indexed as

Glycemic ControlStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersBlood GlucoseDiabetes MellitusFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHealth StatusHeart FailureHospitalizationHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMaleBiomarkersBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanHypoglycemic AgentsHbA1CHeart failure and preserved ejection fractionPrognosisType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID33608002
PMCPMC7893869
OpenAlexW3130920652

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.