Evidence mapPaperPMID 33609191Full record

SynthesisBiochemical genetics2021

Association of eNOS and MCP-1 Genetic Variants with Type 2 Diabetes and Diabetic Nephropathy Susceptibility: A Case-Control and Meta-Analysis Study.

Priyanka Raina, Ruhi Sikka, Himanshu Gupta, Kawaljit Matharoo, Surinder Kumar Bali, Virinder Singh, Ajs Bhanwer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Biochemical genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The Predisposition for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Syndrome.Balkan journal of medical genetics : BJMG · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Priyanka RainaDepartment of Human Genetics, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, 143005, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4552-1294
Ruhi SikkaDepartment of Human Genetics, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, 143005, India.
Himanshu GuptaDepartment of Infection Biology, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Kawaljit MatharooDepartment of Human Genetics, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, 143005, India.
Surinder Kumar BaliDepartment of General Medicine, Government Medical College, Jammu, India.
Virinder SinghDr Virinder Singh Kidney Clinic and Dialysis Centre, Amritsar, Punjab, India.
Ajs BhanwerDepartment of Human Genetics, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, 143005, India. ajsbhanwer@gmail.com.
Guru Nanak Dev University · INGovernment Medical College · INLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology INSPIRE-IF10375UGC-DAE Consortium for Scientific Research, University Grants Commission F.14-2/2008 (NS/PE)UGC-DAE Consortium for Scientific Research, University Grants Commission F.8-2/2008 (NS/PE)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and its secondary complications result from the complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors. To understand the role of these factors on disease susceptibility, the present study was conducted to assess the association of eNOS and MCP-1 variants with T2D and diabetic nephropathy (DN) in two ethnically and geographically different cohorts from North India. A total of 1313 subjects from two cohorts were genotyped for eNOS (rs2070744, rs869109213 and rs1799983) and MCP-1 (rs1024611 and rs3917887) variants. Cohort-I (Punjab) comprised 461 T2D cases (204 T2D with DN and 257 T2D without DN) and 315 healthy controls. Cohort-II (Jammu and Kashmir) included 337 T2D (150 T2D with DN and 187 T2D without DN) and 200 controls. Allele, genotype and haplotype frequencies were compared among the studied participants, and phenotype-genotype interactions were determined. Meta-analysis was performed to investigate the association between the selected variants and disease susceptibility. All three eNOS variants were associated with 1.5-4.0-fold risk of DN in both cohorts. MCP-1 rs1024611 conferred twofold risk towards DN progression in cohort-II, while rs3917887 provided twofold risk for both T2D and DN in both cohorts. eNOS and MCP-1 haplotypes conferred risk for T2D and DN susceptibility. Phenotype-genotype interactions showed significant associations between the studied variants and anthropometric and biochemical parameters. In meta-analysis, all eNOS variants conferred risk towards DN progression, whereas no significant association was observed for MCP-1 rs1024611. We show evidences for an association of eNOS and MCP-1 variants with T2D and DN susceptibility.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseCase-Control StudiesChemokine CCL2Cohort StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NephropathiesEthnicityFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedNitric Oxide Synthase Type IIICCL2 protein, humanChemokine CCL2Nitric Oxide Synthase Type IIINOS3 protein, humanDiabetic nephropathyeNOSGenetic variantMCP-1Type 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID33609191
PMCPMC7896546
OpenAlexW3132974767

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.