Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33610544›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry

Molecular basis of tail-anchored integral membrane protein recognition by the cochaperone Sgt2.

Ku-Feng Lin, Michelle Y Fry, Shyam M Saladi, William M Clemons

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The mechanisms of integral membrane protein biogenesis.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Structural insights into metazoan pretargeting GET complexes.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ku-Feng LinDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
Michelle Y FryDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
Shyam M SaladiDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
William M ClemonsDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA. Electronic address: clemons@caltech.edu.
California Institute of Technology · US

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING IN BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRYT32GM007616 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI STERNBERG, PAUL WARREN · 1985 to 2019
$22.9M
NIH Pioneer AwardDP1GM105385 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CLEMONS, WILLIAM M. · 2012 to 2015
$3.3M
A New Pradigm for the Rational Expression of Integral Membrane ProteinsR01GM125063 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CLEMONS, WILLIAM M., MILLER, THOMAS FRANCIS · 2017 to 2020
$1.5M
Targeting of tail-anchored membrane proteins by the Get pathway.R01GM097572 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CLEMONS, WILLIAM M. · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS DP1 GM105385NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097572NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM125063NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007616
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The targeting and insertion of tail-anchored (TA) integral membrane proteins (IMPs) into the correct membrane is critical for cellular homeostasis. The fungal protein Sgt2, and its human homolog SGTA, is the entry point for clients to the guided entry of tail-anchored protein (GET) pathway, which targets endoplasmic reticulum-bound TA IMPs. Consisting of three structurally independent domains, the C terminus of Sgt2 binds to the hydrophobic transmembrane domain (TMD) of clients. However, the exact binding interface within Sgt2 and molecular details that underlie its binding mechanism and client preference are not known. Here, we reveal the mechanism of Sgt2 binding to hydrophobic clients, including TA IMPs. Through sequence analysis, biophysical characterization, and a series of capture assays, we establish that the Sgt2 C-terminal domain is flexible but conserved and sufficient for client binding. A molecular model for this domain reveals a helical hand forming a hydrophobic groove approximately 15 Å long that is consistent with our observed higher affinity for client TMDs with a hydrophobic face and a minimal length of 11 residues. This work places Sgt2 into a broader family of TPR-containing cochaperone proteins, demonstrating structural and sequence-based similarities to the DP domains in the yeast Hsp90 and Hsp70 coordinating protein, Sti1.

Indexed as

Carrier ProteinsCell MembraneEndoplasmic ReticulumHeat-Shock ProteinsHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansMembrane ProteinsModels, MolecularMolecular ChaperonesProtein BindingProtein MultimerizationSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsUbiquitinCarrier ProteinsHeat-Shock ProteinsHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMolecular ChaperonesSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSgt2 protein, S cerevisiaeSGTA protein, humanSTI1 protein, S cerevisiaeUbiquitincochaperonesHopprotein targetingSti1tail-anchored proteins

Identifiers

PMID33610544
PMCPMC8010706
OpenAlexW3129714619

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.