Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33614290›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2021

modelBuildR: an R package for model building and feature selection with erroneous classifications.

Maximilian Knoll, Jennifer Furkel, Juergen Debus, Amir Abdollahi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maximilian KnollDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Jennifer FurkelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Juergen DebusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Amir AbdollahiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModel building is a crucial part of omics based biomedical research to transfer classifications and obtain insights into underlying mechanisms. Feature selection is often based on minimizing error between model predictions and given classification (maximizing accuracy). Human ratings/classifications, however, might be error prone, with discordance rates between experts of 5-15%. We therefore evaluate if a feature pre-filtering step might improve identification of features associated with true underlying groups.

methodsData was simulated for up to 100 samples and up to 10,000 features, 10% of which were associated with the ground truth comprising 2-10 normally distributed populations. Binary and semi-quantitative ratings with varying error probabilities were used as classification. For feature preselection standard cross-validation (V2) was compared to a novel heuristic (V1) applying univariate testing, multiplicity adjustment and cross-validation on switched dependent (classification) and independent (features) variables. Preselected features were used to train logistic regression/linear models (backward selection, AIC). Predictions were compared against the ground truth (ROC, multiclass-ROC). As use case, multiple feature selection/classification methods were benchmarked against the novel heuristic to identify prognostically different G-CIMP negative glioblastoma tumors from the TCGA-GBM 450 k methylation array data cohort, starting from a fuzzy umap based rough and erroneous separation.

resultsV1 yielded higher median AUC ranks for two true groups (ground truth), with smaller differences for true graduated differences (3-10 groups). Lower fractions of models were successfully fit with V1. Median AUCs for binary classification and two true groups were 0.91 (range: 0.54-1.00) for V1 (Benjamini-Hochberg) and 0.70 (0.28-1.00) for V2, 13% (

conclusionsThe proposed heuristic is beneficial for the retrieval of features associated with two true groups classified with errors. We provide the R package modelBuildR to simplify (comparative) evaluation/application of the proposed heuristic (http://github.com/mknoll/modelBuildR).

Indexed as

Feature selectionG-CIMP negative GBMGlioblastoma multiformeGround truthHigh dimensional dataIllumina humanmethylation array dataLong term/short term survivorMisclassificationModel buildingPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID33614290
PMCPMC7879945

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.