ReviewJournal of the American Heart Association2021
Go Red for Women Strategically Focused Research Network: Summary of Findings and Network Outcomes.
Review in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02835261 (Impact of Sleep Restriction on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Pre vs Postmenopausal Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of Sleep Restriction on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Pre vs Postmenopausal Women
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discordance Between Perceived Risk and Cardiovascular Health in Women of Reproductive Age.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Maternal cardiovascular research and education should be prioritized in the United States.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2025Article
- Brief Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Women With Myocardial Infarction: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- Insulin resistance is associated with subclinical myocardial dysfunction and reduced functional capacity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Journal of cardiology · 2024Article
- Sex and racial disparities in catheter ablation.Heart rhythm O2 · 2022Review
- Review
- Research Goes Red: Early Experience With a Participant-Centric Registry.Circulation research · 2022Article
- Go Red for Women Strategically Focused Research Network: Summary of Findings and Network Outcomes.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Review
- Perceived Heart Attack Likelihood in Adults with a High Diabetes Risk.Heart & lung : the journal of critical careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The Go Red for Women movement was initiated by the American Heart Association (AHA) in the early 2000s to raise awareness concerning cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in women. In 2016, the AHA funded 5 research centers across the United States to advance our knowledge of the risks and presentation of CVD that are specific to women. This report highlights the findings of the centers, showing how insufficient sleep, sedentariness, and pregnancy-related complications may increase CVD risk in women, as well as presentation and factors associated with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in women. These projects were augmented by collaborative ancillary studies assessing the relationships between various lifestyle behaviors, including nightly fasting duration, mindfulness, and behavioral and anthropometric risk factors and CVD risk, as well as metabolomic profiling of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in women. The Go Red for Women Strategically Focused Research Network enhanced the evidence base related to heart disease in women, promoting awareness of the female-specific factors that influence CVD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.