Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33621637›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2021

Dump the "dimorphism": Comprehensive synthesis of human brain studies reveals few male-female differences beyond size.

Lise Eliot, Adnan Ahmed, Hiba Khan, Julie Patel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 164 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
164citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

164 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Country-level gender inequality is associated with structural differences in the brains of women and men.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Visual field map size constrains working memory precision.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

104 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lise EliotDepartment of Foundational Sciences and Humanities, Neuroscience Discipline, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine & Science, 3333 Green Bay Rd., North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA; Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine & Science, 3333 Green Bay Rd., North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA. Electronic address: lise.eliot@rosalindfranklin.edu.
Adnan AhmedChicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine & Science, 3333 Green Bay Rd., North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA.
Hiba KhanChicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine & Science, 3333 Green Bay Rd., North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA.
Julie PatelChicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine & Science, 3333 Green Bay Rd., North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the explosion of neuroimaging, differences between male and female brains have been exhaustively analyzed. Here we synthesize three decades of human MRI and postmortem data, emphasizing meta-analyses and other large studies, which collectively reveal few reliable sex/gender differences and a history of unreplicated claims. Males' brains are larger than females' from birth, stabilizing around 11 % in adults. This size difference accounts for other reproducible findings: higher white/gray matter ratio, intra- versus interhemispheric connectivity, and regional cortical and subcortical volumes in males. But when structural and lateralization differences are present independent of size, sex/gender explains only about 1% of total variance. Connectome differences and multivariate sex/gender prediction are largely based on brain size, and perform poorly across diverse populations. Task-based fMRI has especially failed to find reproducible activation differences between men and women in verbal, spatial or emotion processing due to high rates of false discovery. Overall, male/female brain differences appear trivial and population-specific. The human brain is not "sexually dimorphic."

Indexed as

ConnectomeSex CharacteristicsAdultBrainFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuroimagingAmygdalaAnterior commissureConnectomeCorpus callosumCortical thicknessDefault mode networkEmotionEmpathyGenderHippocampusLateralizationMassa intermediaMental rotationMeta-analysisMRIMultivariatePrecision medicineSexSpatialVerbal

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.