Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33629390›Full record

ReviewThe European journal of neuroscience2022

Modeling heritability of temperamental differences, stress reactivity, and risk for anxiety and depression: Relevance to research domain criteria (RDoC).

Sarah M Clinton, Elizabeth A Shupe, Matthew E Glover, Keaton A Unroe, Chelsea R McCoy, Joshua L Cohen, Ilan A Kerman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The European journal of neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Anxiety and peripheral artery disease.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2026
    Review
  2. Structural Brain Correlates of Childhood Inhibited Temperament: An ENIGMA-Anxiety Mega-Analysis.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah M ClintonSchool of Neuroscience, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7158-411X
Elizabeth A ShupeSchool of Neuroscience, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9297-4694
Matthew E GloverSchool of Neuroscience, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5857-8791
Keaton A UnroeSchool of Neuroscience, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Chelsea R McCoySchool of Neuroscience, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7807-7524
Joshua L CohenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ilan A KermanSchool of Neuroscience, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.

Funding

Epigenetics, Neurodevelopment, and Emotional BehaviorR01MH105447 · NIMH · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI CLINTON, SARAH M · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
Neural Substrates of Somatomotor and Autonomic Disturbances in Major DepressionR00MH081927 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI KERMAN, ILAN A · 2011 to 2013
$719k
Neurodevelopmental Underpinnings of Rodent Anxiety and Depressive BehaviorR00MH085859 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI CLINTON, SARAH M · 2011 to 2013
$705k
Neurodevelopmental Basis of Anxiety and Depressive BehaviorK99MH085859 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CLINTON, SARAH M · 2010 to 2010
$84k
NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH085859NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH081927NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH085859NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH105447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal models provide important tools to study biological and environmental factors that shape brain function and behavior. These models can be effectively leveraged by drawing on concepts from the National Institute of Mental Health Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Initiative, which aims to delineate molecular pathways and neural circuits that underpin behavioral anomalies that transcend psychiatric conditions. To study factors that contribute to individual differences in emotionality and stress reactivity, our laboratory utilized Sprague-Dawley rats that were selectively bred for differences in novelty exploration. Selective breeding for low versus high locomotor response to novelty produced rat lines that differ in behavioral domains relevant to anxiety and depression, particularly the RDoC Negative Valence domains, including acute threat, potential threat, and loss. Bred Low Novelty Responder (LR) rats, relative to their High Responder (HR) counterparts, display high levels of behavioral inhibition, conditioned and unconditioned fear, avoidance, passive stress coping, anhedonia, and psychomotor retardation. The HR/LR traits are heritable, emerge in the first weeks of life, and appear to be driven by alterations in the developing amygdala and hippocampus. Epigenomic and transcriptomic profiling in the developing and adult HR/LR brain suggest that DNA methylation and microRNAs, as well as differences in monoaminergic transmission (dopamine and serotonin in particular), contribute to their distinct behavioral phenotypes. This work exemplifies ways that animal models such as the HR/LR rats can be effectively used to study neural and molecular factors driving emotional behavior, which may pave the way toward improved understanding the neurobiological mechanisms involved in emotional disorders.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionAnimalsAnxiety DisordersDisease Models, AnimalRatsRats, Sprague-Dawleyamygdalaanhedoniahippocampusnegative valencepassive copingthreat

Identifiers

PMID33629390
PMCPMC8382785

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.