Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33630302›Full record

SynthesisClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2021

NT-proBNP Qualifies as a Surrogate for Clinical End Points in Heart Failure.

Walter Schmitt, Hauke Rühs, Rolf Burghaus, Christian Diedrich, Sulav Duwal, Thomas Eissing, Dirk Garmann, Michaela Meyer, Bart Ploeger, Jörg Lippert

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Walter SchmittPharmacometrics, Bayer AG - Pharmaceuticals, Wuppertal, Germany.
Hauke RühsQuantitative Pharmacology, Bayer AG - Pharmaceuticals, Wuppertal, Germany.
Rolf BurghausSystems Pharmacology & Medicine, Bayer AG - Pharmaceuticals, Wuppertal, Germany.
Christian DiedrichSystems Pharmacology & Medicine, Bayer AG - Pharmaceuticals, Wuppertal, Germany.
Sulav DuwalSystems Pharmacology & Medicine, Bayer AG - Pharmaceuticals, Wuppertal, Germany.
Thomas EissingPharmacometrics, Bayer AG - Pharmaceuticals, Wuppertal, Germany.
Dirk GarmannQuantitative Pharmacology, Bayer AG - Pharmaceuticals, Wuppertal, Germany.
Michaela MeyerPharmacometrics, Bayer AG - Pharmaceuticals, Wuppertal, Germany.
Bart PloegerPharmacometrics, Bayer AG - Pharmaceuticals, Wuppertal, Germany.
Jörg LippertPharmacometrics, Bayer AG - Pharmaceuticals, Wuppertal, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is a well-established biomarker in heart failure (HF) but controversially discussed as a potential surrogate marker in HF trials. We analyzed the NT-proBNP/mortality relationship in real-world data (RWD) of 108,330 HF patients from the IBM Watson Health Explorys database and compared it with the NT-proBNP / clinical event end-point relationship in 20 clinical HF studies. With a hierarchical statistical model, we quantified the functional relationship and interstudy variability. To independently qualify the model, we predicted outcome hazard ratios in five phase III HF studies solely based on NT-proBNP measured early in the respective study. In RWD and clinical studies, the relationship between NT-proBNP and clinical outcome is well described by an E

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiomarkersComputer SimulationDatabases, FactualElectronic Health RecordsEndpoint DeterminationHeart FailureHumansModels, StatisticalNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide FragmentsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)

Identifiers

PMID33630302
PMCPMC8360001

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.