Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33637049›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2021

On the use of whole-genome sequence data for across-breed genomic prediction and fine-scale mapping of QTL.

Theo Meuwissen, Irene van den Berg, Mike Goddard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Potential negative effects of genomic selection.Journal of animal science · 2024
    Article
  8. HybridFrontiers in genetics · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Molecular Cytogenetics in Domestic Bovids: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Accuracy of genomic prediction of maternal traits in pigs using Bayesian variable selection methods.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Theo MeuwissenNorwegian University of Life Sciences, Box 5003, 1432, Ås, Norway. theo.meuwissen@nmbu.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3019-4283
Irene van den BergAgriculture Victoria, Bundoora, Australia.
Mike GoddardAgriculture Victoria, Bundoora, Australia.
Agriculture Victoria · AUNorwegian University of Life Sciences · NOThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 255297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhole-genome sequence (WGS) data are increasingly available on large numbers of individuals in animal and plant breeding and in human genetics through second-generation resequencing technologies, 1000 genomes projects, and large-scale genotype imputation from lower marker densities. Here, we present a computationally fast implementation of a variable selection genomic prediction method, that could handle WGS data on more than 35,000 individuals, test its accuracy for across-breed predictions and assess its quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping precision.

methodsThe Monte Carlo Markov chain (MCMC) variable selection model (Bayes GC) fits simultaneously a genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) term, i.e. a polygenic effect whose correlations are described by a genomic relationship matrix (G), and a Bayes C term, i.e. a set of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with large effects selected by the model. Computational speed is improved by a Metropolis-Hastings sampling that directs computations to the SNPs, which are, a priori, most likely to be included into the model. Speed is also improved by running many relatively short MCMC chains. Memory requirements are reduced by storing the genotype matrix in binary form. The model was tested on a WGS dataset containing Holstein, Jersey and Australian Red cattle. The data contained 4,809,520 genotypes on 35,549 individuals together with their milk, fat and protein yields, and fat and protein percentage traits.

resultsThe prediction accuracies of the Jersey individuals improved by 1.5% when using across-breed GBLUP compared to within-breed predictions. Using WGS instead of 600 k SNP-chip data yielded on average a 3% accuracy improvement for Australian Red cows. QTL were fine-mapped by locating the SNP with the highest posterior probability of being included in the model. Various QTL known from the literature were rediscovered, and a new SNP affecting milk production was discovered on chromosome 20 at 34.501126 Mb. Due to the high mapping precision, it was clear that many of the discovered QTL were the same across the five dairy traits.

conclusionsAcross-breed Bayes GC genomic prediction improved prediction accuracies compared to GBLUP. The combination of across-breed WGS data and Bayesian genomic prediction proved remarkably effective for the fine-mapping of QTL.

Indexed as

Quantitative Trait LociAnimalsBreedingCattleFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyMaleMeat ProductsQuantitative Trait, HeritableWhole Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID33637049
PMCPMC7908738
OpenAlexW3129419315

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.