Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33641005›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2021

Treatment personalization in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors.

Chiara Borga, Gianluca Businello, Sabina Murgioni, Francesca Bergamo, Chiara Martini, Eugenio De Carlo, Elisabetta Trevellin, Roberto Vettor, Matteo Fassan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chiara BorgaSurgical Pathology Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Gianluca BusinelloSurgical Pathology Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Sabina MurgioniUnit of Medical Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Francesca BergamoUnit of Medical Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Chiara MartiniEndocrine-Metabolic Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Eugenio De CarloEndocrine-Metabolic Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Elisabetta TrevellinEndocrine-Metabolic Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Roberto VettorEndocrine-Metabolic Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Matteo FassanSurgical Pathology Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy. matteo.fassan@unipd.it.ORCID 0000-0001-6515-5482

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementThe clinical scenario of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) is continuously changing due to significant improvements in the definition of their molecular landscapes and the introduction of innovative therapeutic approaches. Many efforts are currently employed in the integration of the genetics/epigenetics and clinical information. This is leading to an improvement of tumor classification, prognostic stratification and ameliorating the management of patients based on a personalized approach.

Indexed as

Precision MedicineBiomarkers, TumorClinical Decision-MakingCombined Modality TherapyDiagnostic ImagingDisease ManagementDisease SusceptibilityGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHumansMultimodal ImagingNeuroendocrine TumorsPrognosisTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, TumorGEP-NENsImmunotherapyNETsPRRTSSAsTargeted therapies

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.