Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33646413›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2021

Challenges and Controversies in the Genetic Diagnosis of Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia.

Lydia Saputra, Kishore Raj Kumar

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Neuro-Ophthalmologic Manifestations ofJournal of personalized medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Supranuclear Vertical Gaze Palsy in Movement Disorders.Neuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lydia SaputraNorthern Beaches Hospital, Frenchs Forest, New South Wales, Australia.
Kishore Raj KumarGarvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia. kkum4618@uni.sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-3482-6962
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe hereditary spastic paraplegias (HSPs) are a group of disorders characterised by progressive lower limb weakness and spasticity. We address the challenges and controversies involved in the genetic diagnosis of HSP. RECENT

findingsThere is a large and rapidly expanding list of genes implicated in HSP, making it difficult to keep gene testing panels updated. There is also a high degree of phenotypic overlap between HSP and other disorders, leading to problems in choosing the right panel to analyse. We discuss genetic testing strategies for overcoming these diagnostic hurdles, including the use of targeted sequencing gene panels, whole-exome sequencing and whole-genome sequencing. Personalised treatments for HSP are on the horizon, and a genetic diagnosis may hold the key to access these treatments. Developing strategies to overcome the challenges and controversies in HSP may hold the key to a rapid and accurate genetic diagnosis.

Indexed as

Spastic Paraplegia, HereditaryExome SequencingGenetic TestingHumansMutationDiagnosisGeneticsHereditary spastic paraplegiaHSPWhole-exome sequencingWhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID33646413
PMCPMC7921051
OpenAlexW3134740529

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.