Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33652491›Full record

ReviewHormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme2021

Questions and Controversies in the Clinical Application of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors to Treat Patients with Radioiodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: Expert Perspectives.

Frederik A Verburg, Holger Amthauer, Ina Binse, Ingo Brink, Andreas Buck, Andreas Darr, Christine Dierks, Christine Koch, Ute König, Michael C Kreissl and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. FDA Approval Summary: Cabozantinib for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Novel Inhibitor-Based Therapies for Thyroid Cancer-An Update.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 15 institutions in 2 countries.

Frederik A VerburgDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Holger AmthauerCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Ina BinseDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany.
Ingo BrinkDepartment of Medical Diagnostics and Therapy, Ernst von Bergmann Hospital Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Andreas BuckDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Andreas DarrDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
Christine DierksDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Christine KochDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endocrinology, University Clinic Frankfurt, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
Ute KönigDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endocrinology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Michael C KreisslDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Markus LusterDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Christoph ReuterDepartment of Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Klemens ScheidhauerInterdisclipinary Endocrine Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Holger Sven WillenbergDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Medical University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5362-7075
Andreas ZielkeDepartment of Endocrine Surgery, Diakonie Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Matthias SchottDivision of Endocrinology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Philipps University of Marburg · DEDiakonie-Klinikum Stuttgart · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEEssen University Hospital · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEJena University Hospital · DEKlinikum Ernst von Bergmann · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEOtto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DEUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Notwithstanding regulatory approval of lenvatinib and sorafenib to treat radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid carcinoma (RAI-R DTC), important questions and controversies persist regarding this use of these tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). RAI-R DTC experts from German tertiary referral centers convened to identify and explore such issues; this paper summarizes their discussions. One challenge is determining when to start TKI therapy. Decision-making should be shared between patients and multidisciplinary caregivers, and should consider tumor size/burden, growth rate, and site(s), the key drivers of RAI-R DTC morbidity and mortality, along with current and projected tumor-related symptomatology, co-morbidities, and performance status. Another question involves choice of first-line TKIs. Currently, lenvatinib is generally preferred, due to greater increase in progression-free survival versus placebo treatment and higher response rate in its pivotal trial versus that of sorafenib; additionally, in those studies, lenvatinib but not sorafenib showed overall survival benefit in subgroup analysis. Whether recommended maximum or lower TKI starting doses better balance anti-tumor effects versus tolerability is also unresolved. Exploratory analyses of lenvatinib pivotal study data suggest dose-response effects, possibly favoring higher dosing; however, results are awaited of a prospective comparison of lenvatinib starting regimens. Some controversy surrounds determination of net therapeutic benefit, the key criterion for continuing TKI therapy: if tolerability is acceptable, overall disease control may justify further treatment despite limited but manageable progression. Future research should assess potential guideposts for starting TKIs; fine-tune dosing strategies and further characterize antitumor efficacy; and evaluate interventions to prevent and/or treat TKI toxicity, particularly palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and fatigue.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansPhenylurea CompoundsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesQuinolinesSorafenibThyroid NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentslenvatinibPhenylurea CompoundsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesQuinolinesSorafenib

Identifiers

PMID33652491
PMCPMC7932822
OpenAlexW3133822899

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.