Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33654085›Full record

ReviewNature communications2021

Applications, challenges, and needs for employing synthetic biology beyond the lab.

Sierra M Brooks, Hal S Alper

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. MitigatingMicroorganisms · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Current and emerging approaches to manage chronic inflammatory gut disorders.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Rethinking governance of synthetic cells.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sierra M BrooksMcKetta Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6914-2504
Hal S AlperMcKetta Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. halper@che.utexas.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8246-8605

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic biology holds great promise for addressing global needs. However, most current developments are not immediately translatable to 'outside-the-lab' scenarios that differ from controlled laboratory settings. Challenges include enabling long-term storage stability as well as operating in resource-limited and off-the-grid scenarios using autonomous function. Here we analyze recent advances in developing synthetic biological platforms for outside-the-lab scenarios with a focus on three major application spaces: bioproduction, biosensing, and closed-loop therapeutic and probiotic delivery. Across the Perspective, we highlight recent advances, areas for further development, possibilities for future applications, and the needs for innovation at the interface of other disciplines.

Indexed as

LaboratoriesSynthetic BiologyAnimalsBiosensing TechniquesCell-Free SystemDrug Delivery SystemsHumansProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID33654085
PMCPMC7925609

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.