ReviewDer Nervenarzt2021
[Disease-modifying treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disease-modifying therapy in progressive multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMultiple sclerosis (MS) is a disease continuum from a clinically isolated syndrome through relapsing remitting MS to secondary progressive MS (SPMS). There are numerous therapeutic approaches with proven efficacy on relapse and focal inflammatory disease aspects, whereas treatment of secondary progression and associated neuropathological aspects continues to be a challenge.
objectiveOverview of the current options for disease-modifying treatment of SPMS. MATERIAL AND
methodsResults of randomized clinical trials are presented and evaluated on a substance-specific basis.
resultsRandomized SPMS trials showed inconsistent results regarding disability progression for beta interferons and negative results for natalizumab. Oral cladribine and ocrelizumab reduced disability progression in relapsing MS but have not been specifically studied in an SPMS population. Positive results for mitoxantrone are only partially applicable to current SPMS patients. For siponimod, a substance that crosses the blood-brain barrier, the EXPAND trial demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of disability progression in typical SPMS. Subgroup analyses suggest a higher efficacy of siponimod in younger patients with active SPMS.
conclusionThere is limited evidence for the use of previously available disease-modifying treatment in SPMS. Siponimod represents a new therapeutic option for active SPMS, defined by relapses or focal inflammatory MRI activity. To establish the therapeutic indications for siponimod, early detection of relapse-independent progression as well as differentiation of active SPMS from inactive disease are of critical importance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.