Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33657326›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Cell physiology2021

Drivers of dynamic intratumor heterogeneity and phenotypic plasticity.

Antara Biswas, Subhajyoti De

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of physiology. Cell physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Advances in Mapping Tumor Progression from Precancer Atlases.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Tumour Genetic Heterogeneity in Relation to Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Anti-Cancer Treatment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Antara BiswasRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Subhajyoti DeRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New JerseyRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Computational approaches for identifying epigenomic contexts of somatic mutationsR01GM129066 · NIGMS · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DE, SUBHAJYOTI · 2019 to 2023
$1.7M
Inference of tumor growth dynamics using genomic dataR21CA248122 · NCI · RBHS -CANCER INSTITUTE OF NEW JERSEY · PI DE, SUBHAJYOTI · 2020 to 2021
$402k
HHS | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI) R21CA248122HHS | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) R01GM129066NCI NIH HHS R21 CA248122NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM129066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a clonal disease, i.e., all tumor cells within a malignant lesion trace their lineage back to a precursor somatic cell that acquired oncogenic mutations during development and aging. And yet, those tumor cells tend to have genetic and nongenetic variations among themselves-which is denoted as intratumor heterogeneity. Although some of these variations are inconsequential, others tend to contribute to cell state transition and phenotypic heterogeneity, providing a substrate for somatic evolution. Tumor cell phenotypes can dynamically change under the influence of genetic mutations, epigenetic modifications, and microenvironmental contexts. Although epigenetic and microenvironmental changes are adaptive, genetic mutations are usually considered permanent. Emerging reports suggest that certain classes of genetic alterations show extensive reversibility in tumors in clinically relevant timescales, contributing as major drivers of dynamic intratumor heterogeneity and phenotypic plasticity. Dynamic heterogeneity and phenotypic plasticity can confer resistance to treatment, promote metastasis, and enhance evolvability in cancer. Here, we first highlight recent efforts to characterize intratumor heterogeneity at genetic, epigenetic, and microenvironmental levels. We then discuss phenotypic plasticity and cell state transition by tumor cells, under the influence of genetic and nongenetic determinants and their clinical significance in classification of tumors and therapeutic decision-making.

Indexed as

Cell PlasticityGenetic HeterogeneityAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEpigenesis, GeneticGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMutationNeoplasmsPhenotypeTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, Tumorcancer evolutioncell state transitiondrug resistanceintratumor heterogeneityphenotypic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID33657326
PMCPMC8163571
OpenAlexW3133697902

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.