Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33659043›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2021

Head to head evaluation of second generation ALK inhibitors brigatinib and alectinib as first-line treatment for ALK+ NSCLC using an

Enric Carcereny, Alonso Fernández-Nistal, Araceli López, Carmen Montoto, Andrea Naves, Cristina Segú-Vergés, Mireia Coma, Guillem Jorba, Baldomero Oliva, Jose Manuel Mas

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Methods to Develop anFrontiers in psychiatry · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Enric CarcerenyCatalan Institute of Oncology B-ARGO Group, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.
Alonso Fernández-NistalTakeda Farmacéutica España, Madrid, Spain.
Araceli LópezTakeda Farmacéutica España, Madrid, Spain.
Carmen MontotoTakeda Farmacéutica España, Madrid, Spain.
Andrea NavesTakeda Farmacéutica España, Madrid, Spain.
Cristina Segú-VergésAnaxomics Biotech, Barcelona, Spain.
Mireia ComaAnaxomics Biotech, Barcelona, Spain.
Guillem JorbaAnaxomics Biotech, Barcelona, Spain.
Baldomero OlivaStructural Bioinformatics (GRIB-IMIM), Departament de Ciències Experimentals i de la Salut, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Jose Manuel MasAnaxomics Biotech, Barcelona, Spain.
Anaxomics (Spain) · ESPompeu Fabra University · ESInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Around 3-7% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which represent 85% of diagnosed lung cancers, have a rearrangement in the ALK gene that produces an abnormal activity of the ALK protein cell signaling pathway. The developed ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib and lorlatinb present good performance treating ALK+ NSCLC, although all patients invariably develop resistance due to ALK secondary mutations or bypass mechanisms. In the present study, we compare the potential differences between brigatinib and alectinib's mechanisms of action as first-line treatment for ALK+ NSCLC in a systems biology-based

Indexed as

alectinibALK inhibitorbrigatinibmathematical modelsystems biology

Identifiers

PMID33659043
PMCPMC7899557
OpenAlexW3132241918

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.