Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33663385›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2021

Borrelia burgdorferi infection modifies protein content in saliva of Ixodes scapularis nymphs.

Tae Kwon Kim, Lucas Tirloni, Emily Bencosme-Cuevas, Tae Heung Kim, Jolene K Diedrich, John R Yates, Albert Mulenga

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Glycolytic reprogramming in host response toExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. RecombinantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A metalloprotease secreted by an environmentally acquired gut bacterium hindersFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  14. A simple non-invasive method to collect soft tick saliva reveals differences inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  17. What do we know about the microbiome ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  18. The environment, the tick, and the pathogen - It is an ensemble.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  19. Redox Imbalance and Its Metabolic Consequences in Tick-Borne Diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tae Kwon KimDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Lucas TirloniDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Emily Bencosme-CuevasDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Tae Heung KimDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Jolene K DiedrichDepartment of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
John R YatesDepartment of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Albert MulengaDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America. amulenga@cvm.tamu.edu.
Texas A&M University · USKansas State University · USSalk Institute for Biological Studies · USScripps Research Institute · US

Funding

ZDS2P REGULATES SWE1P-DEPENDENT POLARIZED CELL GROWTH IN S CEREVISIAEP41RR011823 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI YATES III, JOHN R · 1996 to 2011
$24.7M
TrainingP41GM103533 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DAVIS, TRISHA N. · 2012 to 2021
$20.7M
Tick saliva and its importance for tick feeding and pathogen transmissionZIAAI001337 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI TIRLONI, LUCAS · 2021 to 2025
$8.5M
Comparative Biomedical Research Training for VeterinariansT32OD011083 · OD · TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH · PI ALBERT MULENGA · 2012 to 2026
$4.8M
Ixodes scapularis and Amblyomma americanum tick cement proteomeR21AI119873 · NIAID · TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH · PI MULENGA, ALBERT · 2016 to 2017
$430k
Tick saliva determinants of Borrelia burgdorferi transmissionR21AI138129 · NIAID · TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH · PI MULENGA, ALBERT · 2019 to 2020
$399k
NCRR NIH HHS 5P41RR011823NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR011823NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI119873NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI138129NIGMS NIH HHS 8P41GM103533NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103533NIH HHS AI119873NIH HHS AI138129NIH HHS T32 OD011083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLyme disease (LD) caused by Borrelia burgdorferi is the most prevalent tick-borne disease. There is evidence that vaccines based on tick proteins that promote tick transmission of B. burgdorferi could prevent LD. As Ixodes scapularis nymph tick bites are responsible for most LD cases, this study sought to identify nymph tick saliva proteins associated with B. burgdorferi transmission using LC-MS/MS. Tick saliva was collected using a non-invasive method of stimulating ticks (uninfected and infected: unfed, and every 12 h during feeding through 72 h, and fully-fed) to salivate into 2% pilocarpine-PBS for protein identification using LC-MS/MS.

resultsWe identified a combined 747 tick saliva proteins of uninfected and B. burgdorferi infected ticks that were classified into 25 functional categories: housekeeping-like (48%), unknown function (18%), protease inhibitors (9%), immune-related (6%), proteases (8%), extracellular matrix (7%), and small categories that account for <5% each. Notably, B. burgdorferi infected ticks secreted high number of saliva proteins (n=645) than uninfected ticks (n=376). Counter-intuitively, antimicrobial peptides, which function to block bacterial infection at tick feeding site were suppressed 23-85 folds in B. burgdorferi infected ticks. Similar to glycolysis enzymes being enhanced in mammalian cells exposed to B. burgdorferi : eight of the 10-glycolysis pathway enzymes were secreted at high abundance by B. burgdorferi infected ticks. Of significance, rabbits exposed to B. burgdorferi infected ticks acquired potent immunity that caused 40-60% mortality of B. burgdorferi infected ticks during the second infestation compared to 15-28% for the uninfected. This might be explained by ELISA data that show that high expression levels of immunogenic proteins in B. burgdorferi infected ticks.

conclusionData here suggest that B. burgdorferi infection modified protein content in tick saliva to promote its survival at the tick feeding site. For instance, enzymes; copper/zinc superoxide dismutase that led to production of H

Indexed as

Borrelia burgdorferiIxodesLyme DiseaseAnimalsChromatography, LiquidHydrogen PeroxideNymphRabbitsSalivaTandem Mass SpectrometryHydrogen Peroxide

Identifiers

PMID33663385
PMCPMC7930271
OpenAlexW3134177525

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.