Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33664701›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

The Role of Behavioral Science in Personalized Multimodal Prehabilitation in Cancer.

Chloe Grimmett, Katherine Bradbury, Suzanne O Dalton, Imogen Fecher-Jones, Meeke Hoedjes, Judit Varkonyi-Sepp, Camille E Short

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. What moves patients to participate in prehabilitation before major surgery? A mixed methods systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Delivering prehabilitation in cancer surgery: a service evaluation at Nottingham University Hospitals.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Supervised prehabilitation in patients scheduled for spinal surgery - a scoping review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Chloe GrimmettSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Katherine BradburySchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Suzanne O DaltonSurvivorship and Inequality in Cancer, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Imogen Fecher-JonesPerioperative Medicine, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Meeke HoedjesDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, CoRPS-Center of Research on Psychological and Somatic Disorders, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Judit Varkonyi-SeppNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Center, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Camille E ShortFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Health Sciences, Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBDanish Cancer Society · DKTilburg University · NLUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Department of Health PDF-2016-09-025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multimodal prehabilitation is increasingly recognized as an important component of the pre-operative pathway in oncology. It aims to optimize physical and psychological health through delivery of a series of tailored interventions including exercise, nutrition, and psychological support. At the core of this prescription is a need for considerable health behavior change, to ensure that patients are engaged with and adhere to these interventions and experience the associated benefits. To date the prehabilitation literature has focused on testing the efficacy of devised exercise and nutritional interventions with a primary focus on physiological and mechanistic outcomes with little consideration for the role of behavioral science, supporting individual behavior change or optimizing patient engagement. Changing health behavior is complex and to maximize success, prehabilitation programs should draw on latest insights from the field of behavioral science. Behavioral science offers extensive knowledge on theories and models of health behavior change to further advance intervention effectiveness. Similarly, interventions developed with a person-centered approach, taking into consideration individual needs and preferences will increase engagement. In this article, we will provide an overview of the extent to which the existing prehabilitation literature incorporates behavioral science, as well as studies that have explored patient's attitudes toward prehabilitation. We will go on to describe and critique ongoing trials in a variety of contexts within oncology prehabilitation and discuss how current scientific knowledge may be enhanced from a behavioral science perspective. We will also consider the role of "surgery schools" and detail practical recommendations that can be embedded in existing or emerging clinical settings.

Indexed as

behavioral sciencebehavior changecancerco-designinterventionsoncologyprehabilitaion

Identifiers

PMID33664701
PMCPMC7921482
OpenAlexW3130024090

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.