ArticleFEBS open bio2021
CRISPR-based knock-in mutagenesis of the pioneer transcription factor FOXA1: optimization of strategies for multi-allelic proteins in cancer cells.
Article in FEBS open bio, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- NOD1 modulates chronic obstructive pulmonary disease progression via FOXA1/NLRP3-mediated regulation of pyroptosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Ten Years of CRISPRing Cancers In Vitro.Cancers · 2022Review
- Functional annotation of breast cancer risk loci: current progress and future directions.British journal of cancer · 2022Review
- Entering the second decade: FEBS Open Bio in 2022.FEBS open bio · 2022Article
- The precise magic of CRISPR.FEBS open bio · 2021Article
- New Insights into the Therapeutic Applications of CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing in Breast Cancer.Genes · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Precise genome engineering of living cells has been revolutionized by the introduction of the highly specific and easily programmable properties of the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) technology. This has greatly accelerated research into human health and has facilitated the discovery of novel therapeutics. CRISPR-Cas9 is most widely employed for its ability to inactivate or knockout specific genes, but can be also used to introduce subtle site-specific substitutions of DNA sequences that can lead to changes in the amino acid composition of proteins. Despite the proven success of CRISPR-based knock-in strategies of genes in typical diploid cells (i.e., cells containing two sets of chromosomes), precise editing of cancer cells, that typically have unstable genomes and multiple copies of chromosomes, is more challenging and not adequately addressed in the literature. Herein, we detail our methodology for replacing endogenous proteins with intended knock-in mutants in polyploid cancer cells and discuss our experimental design, screening strategy, and facile allele frequency estimation methodology. As proof of principle, we performed genome editing of specific amino acids within the pioneer transcription factor FOXA1, a critical component of estrogen and androgen receptor signaling, in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. We confirm mutant FOXA1 protein expression and intended amino acid substitutions via western blotting and mass spectrometry. In addition, we show that mutant allele frequency estimation is easily achieved by topoisomerase-based cloning combined with allele-specific PCR, which we later confirmed by next-generation RNA-sequencing. Typically, there are 4 - 5 copies (alleles) of FOXA1 in breast cancer cells, making the editing of this protein inherently challenging. As a result, most studies that focus on FOXA1 mutants rely on ectopic overexpression of FOXA1 from a plasmid. Therefore, we provide an optimized methodology for replacing endogenous wild-type FOXA1 with precise knock-in mutants to enable the systematic analysis of its molecular mechanisms within the appropriate physiological context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.