ArticlePloS one2021
The acceptance and impact of Google Classroom integrating into a clinical pathology course for nursing students: A technology acceptance model approach.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05495919 (The Effectiveness of Different Teaching Models in Nursing Education in the Pandemic), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effectiveness of Different Teaching Models in Nursing Education in the Pandemic: Randomized Controlled Experimental Research
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Blended nutrition education with real-life scenarios enhances learning and nutritional counseling capabilities in nursing students.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Delphi study on evidence-based CKD prevention strategies for nurses in resource-limited settings: focus on e-learning implementation.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
- Exploring the acceptance of e-learning in health professions education in Iran based on the technology acceptance model (TAM).Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Challenges and strategies for cultivating young teachers in pathophysiology departments at Chinese medical colleges: a narrative review.Ewha medical journal · 2025Review
- Adoption of quick response codes as a digital microlearning tool among clinical nurses: a quasi-experimental study.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Design and practice of blended teaching of internal medicine nursing based on O-AMAS effective teaching model.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- 'Internet+' comprehensive nursing training course in the post-epidemic era-an exploration of the mixed teaching mode: a randomized trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Mobile technology acceptance among undergraduate nursing students instructed by blended learning at selected educational institutions in South India.Journal of education and health promotion · 2023Article
- A Case Study of Factors That Affect Secondary School Mathematics Achievement: Teacher-Parent Support, Stress Levels, and Students' Well-Being.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- When It Comes to Screen Golf and Baseball, What Do Participants Think?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Evaluating e-Learning in the Pathology Course During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Advances in medical education and practice · 2022Article
- Teaching pathology differently: Comparision between three diverse teaching learning methods.Medical journal, Armed Forces IndiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGoogle Classroom (GC) is a free web-based instructional platform rarely used for nursing student education. The acceptance, intention to use, and learning outcomes of GC remain unclear in Taiwan. We sought to identify the technology acceptance level and factors affection the intention to use GC. We also explored how integrating GC into traditional teaching affects learning satisfaction and academic achievement among nursing students in Taiwan.
methodsIn this randomized controlled study, based on a technology acceptance framework, 74 nursing students were randomly assigned in clusters to experimental (n = 39) and control (n = 35) groups during the spring semester of 2018. In Weeks 3-18, each member of the experimental group received one hour of traditional and GC teaching per week. The control group received two hours of traditional teaching per week. Both groups were asked to complete questionnaires to evaluate learning satisfaction and academic achievement during weeks 10 (mid-semester) and 18 (end-of-semester). The experimental group additionally completed technology acceptance questionnaires in both situations.
findingsIn the experimental group, the overall end-of-semester technology acceptance score was high (141.8 out of 155); their perceived ease of use, intention to use, and technology acceptance scores increased significantly compared to mid-semester (p<0.05). At the end-of-semester, perceived playfulness and perceived usefulness explained 63.5% of the variance in intention to use. Regardless of whether the assessment was administered mid-semester or at the end-of-semester, the experimental group had higher learning satisfaction and academic achievement scores than the control group. However, the degree of progress on learning satisfaction and academic achievement demonstrated no significant between-group differences.
conclusionsThe experimental group demonstrated high acceptance of GC. Playfulness and usefulness positively influenced nursing students' intention to use GC. Blended learning-in combination with GC and traditional methods-resulted in similar learning satisfaction and academic achievement when compared to traditional learning. More research is needed to explore the effectiveness of blended learning through the GC platform with different courses and ethnic groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.