Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33669593›Full record

ReviewBiology2021

Crosstalk between Different DNA Repair Pathways Contributes to Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Swapnil Gupta, Panpan You, Tanima SenGupta, Hilde Nilsen, Kulbhushan Sharma

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Novel Techniques for Mapping DNA Damage and Repair in the Brain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Genome Integrity and Neurological Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Swapnil GuptaDepartment of Clinical Molecular Biology, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway.
Panpan YouDepartment of Clinical Molecular Biology, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway.
Tanima SenGuptaDepartment of Clinical Molecular Biology, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway.
Hilde NilsenDepartment of Clinical Molecular Biology, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway.
Kulbhushan SharmaDepartment of Clinical Molecular Biology, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5226-4209
University of Oslo · NO

Funding

Helse Sør-Øst RHF 279922Norges Forskningsråd 302483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic integrity is maintained by DNA repair and the DNA damage response (DDR). Defects in certain DNA repair genes give rise to many rare progressive neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs), such as ocular motor ataxia, Huntington disease (HD), and spinocerebellar ataxias (SCA). Dysregulation or dysfunction of DDR is also proposed to contribute to more common NDDs, such as Parkinson's disease (PD), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). Here, we present mechanisms that link DDR with neurodegeneration in rare NDDs caused by defects in the DDR and discuss the relevance for more common age-related neurodegenerative diseases. Moreover, we highlight recent insight into the crosstalk between the DDR and other cellular processes known to be disturbed during NDDs. We compare the strengths and limitations of established model systems to model human NDDs, ranging from

Indexed as

ALSAlzheimercGAS-STINGDNA damage responseneurodegenerationneuroinflammationoxidative stressParkinsonPARP

Identifiers

PMID33669593
PMCPMC7922961
OpenAlexW3131999044

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.