ArticleGenes2021
Investigating the Adoption of Clinical Genomics in Australia. An Implementation Science Case Study.
Article in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of consumers' knowledge, attitudes and experiences of primary health professionals' role in genomic medicine.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Pooled it
- Improving Lynch syndrome detection: a mixed-methods process evaluation of a hybrid type III effectiveness-implementation trial.BMC health services research · 2024Trial
- What influenced the use of embedded genetic expertise by non-genetic clinicians: a qualitative study using the diffusion of innovations theory and theoretical domains framework.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Polygenic risk scores in the clinic: Health-system leaders and primary care providers weigh in.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025Article
- Utilisation of subsidised genetic and genomic testing in a publicly funded healthcare system 2014-2023.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
- Navigating an Uninformative Genomic Test Result: A Practical Guide.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2025Review
- Optimising the mainstreaming of renal genomics: Complementing empirical and theoretical strategies for implementation.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
- Combining Implementation and Data Sciences to Accelerate Evidence Integration into Healthcare - ImpleMATE.F1000Research · 2025Article
- Adopting Public Health Genomics when the House Is on Fire: How Will We Navigate to 2030?Public health genomics · 2025Article
- Identifying barriers and opportunities to facilitate the uptake of whole genome sequencing in paediatric haematology and oncology practice.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Implementation considerations for risk-tailored cancer screening in the population: A scoping review.Preventive medicine · 2024Article
- Aligning intuition and theory: a novel approach to identifying the determinants of behaviours necessary to support implementation of evidence into practice.Implementation science : IS · 2023Article
- Australian Genomics: Outcomes of a 5-year national program to accelerate the integration of genomics in healthcare.American journal of human genetics · 2023Review
- A Theory-Informed Systematic Review of Barriers and Enablers to Implementing Multi-Drug Pharmacogenomic Testing.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Article
- Attitudes of Australian dermatologists on the use of genetic testing: A cross-sectional survey with a focus on melanoma.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Developing a National Newborn Genomes Program: An Approach Driven by Ethics, Engagement and Co-design.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the overwhelming interest in clinical genomics, uptake has been slow. Implementation science offers a systematic approach to reveal pathways to adoption and a theory informed approach to addressing barriers presented. Using case study methodology, we undertook 16 in-depth interviews with nongenetic medical specialists to identify barriers and enablers to the uptake of clinical genomics. Data collection and analysis was guided by two evidence-based behaviour change models: the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), and the Capability, Opportunity Motivation Behaviour model (COM-B). Our findings revealed the use of implementation science not only provided a theoretical structure to frame the study but also facilitated uncovering of traditionally difficult to access responses from participants, e.g., "safety in feeling vulnerable" (TDF code
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.