Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33676496›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Embedding an economist in regional and rural health services to add value and reduce waste by improving local-level decision-making: protocol for the 'embedded Economist' program and evaluation.

Andrew Searles, Donella Piper, Christine Jorm, Penny Reeves, Maree Gleeson, Jonathan Karnon, Nicholas Goodwin, Kenny Lawson, Rick Iedema, Jane Gray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrew SearlesHunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia. andrew.searles@hmri.org.au.
Donella PiperNew South Wales Regional Health Partners, Newcastle, Australia.
Christine JormSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Penny ReevesHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
Maree GleesonFaculty of Health and Medicine, School of Biomedical Sciences & Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Jonathan KarnonCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Nicholas GoodwinFaculty of Health and Medicine, Central Coast Research Institute for Integrated Care, University of Newcastle & Central Coast Local Health District, Gosford, Australia.
Kenny LawsonHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
Rick IedemaCentre for Team-Based Practice & Learning in Health Care, King's College London, London, UK.
Jane GrayPartnerships, Innovation and Research, Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, Australia.

Funding

Medical Research Future Fund MRF9100005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystematic approaches to the inclusion of economic evaluation in national healthcare decision-making are usual. It is less common for economic evaluation to be routinely undertaken at the 'local-level' (e.g. in a health service or hospital) despite the largest proportion of health care expenditure being determined at this service level and recognition by local health service decision makers of the need for capacity building in economic evaluation skills. This paper describes a novel program - the embedded Economist (eE) Program. The eE Program aims to increase local health service staff awareness of, and develop their capacity to access and apply, economic evaluation principles in decision making. The eE program evaluation is also described. The aim of the evaluation is to capture the contextual, procedural and relational aspects that assist and detract from the eE program aims; as well as the outcomes and impact from the specific eE projects.

methodsThe eE Program consists of a embedding a health economist in six health services and the provision of supported education in applied economic evaluation, provided via a community of practice and a university course. The embedded approach is grounded in co-production, embedded researchers and 'slow science'. The sites, participants, and program design are described. The program evaluation includes qualitative data collection via surveys, semi-structured interviews, observations and field diaries. In order to share interim findings, data are collected and analysed prior, during and after implementation of the eE program, at each of the six health service sites. The surveys will be analysed by calculating frequencies and descriptive statistics. A thematic analysis will be conducted on interview, observation and filed diary data. The Framework to Assess the Impact from Translational health research (FAIT) is utilised to assess the overall impact of the eE Program. DISCUSSION: This program and evaluation will contribute to knowledge about how best to build capacity and skills in economic evaluation amongst decision-makers working in local-level health services. It will examine the extent to which participants are able to improve their ability to utilise evidence to inform decisions, avoid waste and improve the value of care delivery.

Indexed as

Rural Health ServicesCapacity BuildingDelivery of Health CareHumansProgram EvaluationSurveys and QuestionnairesEconomic evaluationEmbedded researcherHealth economicsHealth services researchMeasuring impactProgram evaluationValue-based healthcare

Identifiers

PMID33676496
PMCPMC7936595

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.