Evidence mapPaperPMID 33677783Full record

SynthesisObesity surgery2021

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy with Omentopexy: Is It Really a Promising Method?-A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.

Piotr Zarzycki, Jan Kulawik, Piotr Małczak, Mateusz Rubinkiewicz, Mateusz Wierdak, Piotr Major

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Piotr Zarzycki2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Jakubowskiego 2 st., 30-688, Krakow, Poland.
Jan Kulawik2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Jakubowskiego 2 st., 30-688, Krakow, Poland.
Piotr Małczak2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Jakubowskiego 2 st., 30-688, Krakow, Poland.
Mateusz Rubinkiewicz2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Jakubowskiego 2 st., 30-688, Krakow, Poland.
Mateusz Wierdak2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Jakubowskiego 2 st., 30-688, Krakow, Poland.
Piotr Major2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Jakubowskiego 2 st., 30-688, Krakow, Poland. piotr.major@uj.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6552-7979
Jagiellonian University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most commonly performed bariatric procedure worldwide. Omentopexy during LSG is a novel variation of this well-established technique. There are no clear conclusions on indications for this procedure, safeness, and effects of such a method. We aimed to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) with omentopexy (OP) and without omentopexy. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe searched the Medline, EMBASE, and Scopus databases up-to June 2020. Full-text articles and conference abstracts were included for further analysis. This review follows the PRISMA guidelines.

resultsOf initial 66 records, only 4 studies (N = 1396 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Our findings showed that LSG with omentopexy had significantly lowered overall morbidity compared to LSG without omentopexy (RR = 0.38; 95% CI [0.15, 0.94]; p=0.04). Gastric leakage rate (RR = 0.17; 95% CI [0.04, 0.76]; p = 0.02) was also significantly lower in LSG with omentopexy. There were no significant differences between groups in length of hospital stay.

conclusionsOur meta-analysis showed that LSG with omentopexy may be a feasible procedure for decreasing morbidity and gastric leak rate. However, despite promising results, the procedure needs to be researched more in randomized controlled studies to draw solid conclusions.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidGastrectomyHumansTreatment OutcomeBariatric surgeryLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomyMeta-analysisOmentopexySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33677783
PMCPMC8113139
OpenAlexW3135859750

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.