ArticleTissue engineering. Part C, Methods2021
Cartilage Assessment Requires a Surface Characterization Protocol: Roughness, Friction, and Function.
Article in Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultra depth of field microscopy: a novel method for observing and characterizing of articular cartilage surface.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Nasal Cartilage Preserved in Ethanol at 4 °C versus Normal Saline at -18 °C for Rhinoplasty Reuse.Iranian journal of otorhinolaryngology · 2026Article
- Minipig costal and knee cartilage structure-function relationships and their use as cell sources for tissue-engineered analogous cellular products for cartilage repair.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Article
- Multifunctional MeHA hydrogel for living materials delivery with enhanced cartilage regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Proof-of-concept study of the TriBot: a robot-based test setup for biotribological analyses of curved articular surfaces.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Regenerative Variability of Human Juvenile Chondrocyte Sheets From Different Cell Donors in an Athymic Rat Knee Chondral Defect Model.Cartilage · 2024Article
- A biomechanical assessment of tissue-engineered polymer neo-uteri after orthotopic implantation.F&S science · 2024Article
- Alterations in articular cartilage frictional properties in the setting of acute gouty arthritis.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Co-Electrospun Poly(ε-Caprolactone)/Zein Articular Cartilage Scaffolds.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- From Molecular to Multiasperity Contacts: How Roughness Bridges the Friction Scale Gap.ACS nano · 2023Article
- Segmentation of polyps based on pyramid vision transformers and residual block for real-time endoscopy imaging.Journal of pathology informatics · 2023Article
- Optimization of In Situ Indentation Protocol to Map the Mechanical Properties of Articular Cartilage.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Navigating regulatory pathways for translation of biologic cartilage repair products.Science translational medicine · 2022Review
- Yucatan Minipig Knee Meniscus Regional Biomechanics and Biochemical Structure Support its Suitability as a Large Animal Model for Translational Research.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- A Tribological Comparison of Facet Joint, Sacroiliac Joint, and Knee Cartilage in the Yucatan Minipig.Cartilage · 2021Article
- Vibrometry as a noncontact alternative to dynamic and viscoelastic mechanical testing in cartilage.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021Article
- Articular and Artificial Cartilage, Characteristics, Properties and Testing Approaches-A Review.Polymers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The surface of articular cartilage is integral to smooth, low-friction joint articulation. However, the majority of cartilage literature rarely includes measurements of surface characteristics and function. This may, in part, be due to a shortage of or unfamiliarity with fast, nondestructive, and, preferably, noncontact methods that can be applied to large cartilage surfaces for evaluating cartilage surface characteristics. A comprehensive methodology for characterizing cartilage surfaces is useful in determining changes in tissue function, as for example, in cases where the quality of cartilage grafts needs to be assessed. With cartilage storage conditions being an area of ongoing and active research, this study used interferometry and tribology methods as efficient and nondestructive ways of evaluating changes in cartilage surface topography, roughness, and coefficient of friction (CoF) resulting from various storage temperatures and durations. Standard, destructive testing for bulk mechanical and biochemical properties, as well as immunohistochemistry, were also performed. For the first time, interferometry was used to show cartilage topographical anisotropy through an anterior-posterior striated pattern in the same direction as joint articulation. Another novel observation enabled by tribology was frictional anisotropy, illustrated by a 53% increase in CoF in the medial-lateral direction compared to the anterior-posterior direction. Of the storage conditions examined, 37°C, 4°C, -20°C, and -80°C for 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month, a 49% decrease in CoF was observed at 1 week in -80°C. Interestingly, prolonged storage at 37°C resulted in up to an 83% increase in the compressive aggregate modulus by 1 month, with a corresponding increase in the glycosaminoglycan (GAG) bulk content. This study illustrates the differential effects of storage conditions on cartilage: freezing tends to target surface properties, while nonfreezing storage impacts the tissue bulk. These data show that a bulk-only analysis of cartilage function is not sufficient or representative. The nondestructive surface characterization assays described here enable improvement in cartilage functionality assessment by considering both surface and bulk cartilage properties; this methodology may thus provide a new angle to explore in future cartilage research and tissue engineering endeavors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.