Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33694334›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2021

Pseudo-Enhancement in Intracranial Aneurysms on Black-Blood MRI: Effects of Flow Rate, Spatial Resolution, and Additional Flow Suppression.

Mariya S Pravdivtseva, Franziska Gaidzik, Philipp Berg, Carson Hoffman, Leonardo A Rivera-Rivera, Rafael Medero, Lindsay Bodart, Alejandro Roldan-Alzate, Michael A Speidel, Kevin M Johnson and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Luminal enhancement in intracranial aneurysms: fact or feature?-A quantitative multimodal flow analysis.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mariya S PravdivtsevaSection Biomedical Imaging, Molecular Imaging North Competence Center (MOIN CC), Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9442-088X
Franziska GaidzikLaboratory of Fluid Dynamics and Technical Flows, Forschungscampus STIMULATE, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Philipp BergLaboratory of Fluid Dynamics and Technical Flows, Forschungscampus STIMULATE, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Carson HoffmanDepartment of Medical Physics and Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4158-4976
Leonardo A Rivera-RiveraDepartment of Medical Physics and Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Rafael MederoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Lindsay BodartDepartment of Medical Physics and Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Alejandro Roldan-AlzateDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Michael A SpeidelDepartment of Medical Physics and Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Kevin M JohnsonDepartment of Medical Physics and Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Oliver WiebenDepartment of Medical Physics and Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Olav JansenDepartment of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Jan-Bernd HövenerSection Biomedical Imaging, Molecular Imaging North Competence Center (MOIN CC), Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Naomi LarsenDepartment of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DEMax Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

BIOTECHNOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008349 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI FOX, BRIAN G · 1989 to 2019
$22.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVessel-wall enhancement (VWE) on black-blood MRI (BB MRI) has been proposed as an imaging marker for a higher risk of rupture and associated with wall inflammation. Whether VWE is causally linked to inflammation or rather induced by flow phenomena has been a subject of debate. PURPOSE: To study the effects of slow flow, spatial resolution, and motion-sensitized driven equilibrium (MSDE) preparation on signal intensities in BB MRI of patient-specific aneurysm flow models. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. SUBJECTS/FLOW ANEURYSM MODEL/VIRTUAL VESSELS: Aneurysm flow models based on 3D rotational angiography datasets of three patients with intracranial aneurysms were 3D printed and perfused at two different flow rates, with and without Gd-containing contrast agent. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Variable refocusing flip angle 3D fast-spin echo sequence at 3 T with and without MSDE with three voxel sizes ((0.5 mm) ASSESSMENT: Three independent observers performed a qualitative visual assessment of flow patterns and signal enhancement. Quantitative analysis included voxel-wise evaluation of signal intensities and magnitude velocity distributions in the aneurysm. STATISTICAL TESTS: Kruskal-Wallis test, potential regressions.

resultsA hyperintense signal in the lumen and adjacent to the aneurysm walls on BB MRI was colocalized with slow flow. Signal intensities increased by a factor of 2.56 ± 0.68 (P < 0.01) after administering Gd contrast. After Gd contrast administration, the signal was suppressed most in conjunction with high flows and with MSDE (2.41 ± 2.07 for slow flow without MSDE, and 0.87 ± 0.99 for high flow with MSDE). A clear result was not achieved by modifying the spatial resolution . DATA

conclusionsSlow-flow phenomena contribute substantially to aneurysm enhancement and vary with MRI parameters. This should be considered in the clinical setting when assessing VWE in patients with an unruptured aneurysm. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Indexed as

Intracranial AneurysmBlack or African AmericanHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingProspective Studiesaneurysmflow suppressionslow flowvessel-wall enhancement

Identifiers

PMID33694334
PMCPMC8403769
OpenAlexW3134216469

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.