Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33705374›Full record

ReviewPLoS genetics2021

Human genetic admixture.

Katharine L Korunes, Amy Goldberg

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Empirical validation of race-neutral normative brain morphometry models across ethnoracially diverse populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Strategies for the Genomic Analysis of Admixed Populations.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katharine L KorunesDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2648-4707
Amy GoldbergDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9306-1539
Duke University · US

Funding

Inferring the evolutionary history of admixed populationsR35GM133481 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Amy Goldberg · 2019 to 2026
$2.8M
Natural Selection in Admixed PopulationsF32GM139313 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KORUNES, KATHARINE LOVE · 2020 to 2021
$114k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM139313NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133481
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Throughout human history, large-scale migrations have facilitated the formation of populations with ancestry from multiple previously separated populations. This process leads to subsequent shuffling of genetic ancestry through recombination, producing variation in ancestry between populations, among individuals in a population, and along the genome within an individual. Recent methodological and empirical developments have elucidated the genomic signatures of this admixture process, bringing previously understudied admixed populations to the forefront of population and medical genetics. Under this theme, we present a collection of recent PLOS Genetics publications that exemplify recent progress in human genetic admixture studies, and we discuss potential areas for future work.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationGenetic VariationHuman GeneticsModels, GeneticAllelesGenome, HumanGeographyHaplotypesHumansQuantitative Trait LociSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID33705374
PMCPMC7951803
OpenAlexW3133796649

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.