Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33707543›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Precision medicine and machine learning towards the prediction of the outcome of potential celiac disease.

Francesco Piccialli, Francesco Calabrò, Danilo Crisci, Salvatore Cuomo, Edoardo Prezioso, Roberta Mandile, Riccardo Troncone, Luigi Greco, Renata Auricchio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The needle study: Machine learning as a new method for case-finding in celiac disease.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Celiac disease: From genetics to epigenetics.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesco PiccialliDepartment of Mathematics and Applications "Renato Caccioppoli", University of Naples "Federico II", Via Cintia, Monte S. Angelo, 80126, Naples, Italy.
Francesco CalabròDepartment of Mathematics and Applications "Renato Caccioppoli", University of Naples "Federico II", Via Cintia, Monte S. Angelo, 80126, Naples, Italy. francesco.calabro@unina.it.
Danilo CrisciDepartment of Mathematics and Applications "Renato Caccioppoli", University of Naples "Federico II", Via Cintia, Monte S. Angelo, 80126, Naples, Italy.
Salvatore CuomoDepartment of Mathematics and Applications "Renato Caccioppoli", University of Naples "Federico II", Via Cintia, Monte S. Angelo, 80126, Naples, Italy.
Edoardo PreziosoDepartment of Mathematics and Applications "Renato Caccioppoli", University of Naples "Federico II", Via Cintia, Monte S. Angelo, 80126, Naples, Italy.
Roberta MandileDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Riccardo TronconeDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Luigi GrecoDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Renata AuricchioDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
University of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Potential Celiac Patients (PCD) bear the Celiac Disease (CD) genetic predisposition, a significant production of antihuman transglutaminase antibodies, but no morphological changes in the small bowel mucosa. A minority of patients (17%) showed clinical symptoms and need a gluten free diet at time of diagnosis, while the majority progress over several years (up to a decade) without any clinical problem neither a progression of the small intestine mucosal damage even when they continued to assume gluten in their diet. Recently we developed a traditional multivariate approach to predict the natural history, on the base of the information at enrolment (time 0) by a discriminant analysis model. Still, the traditional multivariate model requires stringent assumptions that may not be answered in the clinical setting. Starting from a follow-up dataset available for PCD, we propose the application of Machine Learning (ML) methodologies to extend the analysis on available clinical data and to detect most influent features predicting the outcome. These features, collected at time of diagnosis, should be capable to classify patients who will develop duodenal atrophy from those who will remain potential. Four ML methods were adopted to select features predictive of the outcome; the feature selection procedure was indeed capable to reduce the number of overall features from 85 to 19. ML methodologies (Random Forests, Extremely Randomized Trees, and Boosted Trees, Logistic Regression) were adopted, obtaining high values of accuracy: all report an accuracy above 75%. The specificity score was always more than 75% also, with two of the considered methods over 98%, while the best performance of sensitivity was 60%. The best model, optimized Boosted Trees, was able to classify PCD starting from the selected 19 features with an accuracy of 0.80, sensitivity of 0.58 and specificity of 0.84. Finally, with this work, we are able to categorize PCD patients that can more likely develop overt CD using ML. ML techniques appear to be an innovative approach to predict the outcome of PCD, since they provide a step forward in the direction of precision medicine aimed to customize healthcare, medical therapies, decisions, and practices tailoring the clinical management of PCD children.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPrecision MedicineCeliac DiseaseFollow-Up StudiesHumansPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID33707543
PMCPMC7952550
OpenAlexW3135574264

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.