ReviewCurrent behavioral neuroscience reports2021
The Importance of Common Currency Tasks in Translational Psychiatry.
Review in Current behavioral neuroscience reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Across preclinical and clinical platforms, approved and investigational psychiatric drugs share pathways and associate with similar molecular functions.Frontiers in drug discovery · 2025Article
- State-transition-free reinforcement learning in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).Learning & behavior · 2023Article
- Article
- Identifying Transdiagnostic Mechanisms in Mental Health Using Computational Factor Modeling.Biological psychiatry · 2023Review
- Computational perspectives on human fear and anxiety.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2023Review
- Catastrophizing and Risk-Taking.Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023Article
- Are Fear and Anxiety Truly Distinct?Biological psychiatry global open science · 2022Review
- Reinforcement learning modeling reveals a reward-history-dependent strategy underlying reversal learning in squirrel monkeys.Behavioral neuroscience · 2022Article
- Cross-species anxiety tests in psychiatry: pitfalls and promises.Molecular psychiatry · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewCommon currency tasks are tasks that investigate the same phenomenon in different species. In this review, we discuss how to ensure the translational validity of common currency tasks, summarise their benefits, present recent research in this area and offer future directions and recommendations. RECENT
findingsWe discuss the strengths and limitations of three specific examples where common currency tasks have added to our understanding of psychiatric constructs-affective bias, reversal learning and goal-based decision making. SUMMARY: Overall, common currency tasks offer the potential to improve drug discovery in psychiatry. We recommend that researchers prioritise construct validity above face validity when designing common currency tasks and suggest that the evidence for construct validity is summarised in papers presenting research in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.